Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34545513›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2022

Gambling in Canada During the COVID Lockdown: Prospective National Survey.

Carrie A Shaw, David C Hodgins, Robert J Williams, Yale D Belanger, Darren R Christensen, Nady El-Guebaly, Daniel S McGrath, Fiona Nicoll, Garry J Smith, Rhys M G Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. COVID-19 and resultant restrictions on gambling behaviour.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carrie A ShawCentre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming, University of Gibraltar, Europa Point Campus, Gibraltar, GX11 1AA, Gibraltar. carrieann.shaw1@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-0084
David C HodginsUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-5200
Robert J WilliamsUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-9588
Yale D BelangerUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6105-4780
Darren R ChristensenUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-8032
Nady El-GuebalyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8147-7198
Daniel S McGrathUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-942X
Fiona NicollUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-0376
Garry J SmithUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Rhys M G StevensUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-1987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study investigated the impact of the COVID pandemic lockdown on gambling and problem gambling in Canada. The AGRI National Project's online panel participants (N = 3449) provided baseline gambling data 6 months prior to the pandemic. Re-surveying this sample during the lockdown provided an opportunity to make quantitative comparisons of the changes. Nearly one-third of gamblers reported ceasing gambling altogether during the lockdown. For the continuing gamblers, quantitative data indicated significant decreases in gambling frequency, time spent in gambling sessions, money spent, and the number of game types played. Qualitative perceptions of changes in gambling were examined and the accuracy of these reports were not closely aligned with actual changes in gambling. Gambling platform was the only gambling engagement metric where increases were found with ~ 17% of the gambling sample migrating to online gambling during the lockdown. Although problem gambling within the sample generally declined, consistent with previous literature, it was also found that gambling online-among other biopsychosocial factors-was a significant predictor for classification as a problem gambler during the lockdown. COVID-specific influences on health, employment, leisure time and social isolation were moderately associated with problem gambling scores but were not independent predictors of changes in gambling engagement during lockdown. Future studies are required to assess if the pandemic related changes in gambling evidenced in this study remain stable, or if engagement reverts to pre-pandemic levels when the pandemic response allows for the re-opening of land-based gambling venues.

Indexed as

COVID-19GamblingCanadaCommunicable Disease ControlHumansProspective StudiesCOVIDGamblingOnline gamblingPandemicProblem gambling

Identifiers

PMID34545513
PMCPMC8451724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.