ArticleHNO2022
[On the effectiveness of digital teaching of practical skills in curricular ENT education].
Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Seeing inside out": revealing the effectiveness of otoscopy training in virtual reality enhanced practical exams - a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- The role of digital teaching methods in supporting practical skills training in the academic training of health professions - a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- e-Learning in Phoniatrics and Speech-Language Pathology: Exploratory Analysis of Free Access Tools in Augmentative and Alternative Communication.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Ultrasound education in the digital era: face-to-face vs. webinar-teaching of head and neck ultrasound theory-a prospective multi-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- [Providing practical skills in curricular teaching-effect of SkillsLab and flipped classroom].HNO · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Misjudgment of Skills in Clinical Examination Increases in Medical Students Due to a Shift to Exclusively Online Studies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the current COVID-19 pandemic, the curricular courses at faculties of medicine had to be digitalized within a short time. This poses a particular challenge regarding the teaching of practical skills.
objectiveTo determine to what extent practical skills can be learned within the framework of a fully digitally implemented ENT mirror examination, the minimum number of teaching units (UE) required for competent execution, and the difficulty of the various examinations were identified. MATERIALS AND
methodsDuring a period of 5 days of their ENT block internship, a total of 146 students learned six ENT mirror examinations in daily videoconferences. A subgroup (n = 48) was assessed formatively each day and the increase in performance was statistically analysed over the 5 days. On the fifth day, exams were carried out with the entire cohort.
resultsOver the course of the 5 days, a significant increase in performance was observed in the various examinations. Based on the evaluation of the increase in performance in the subsections, examinations could also be classified as "simple" and "difficult." Peak performance according to competence level 3a of the Nationaler Kompetenzorientierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin (NKLM) was achieved on day 4 after 5 UE had been completed.
conclusionPractical skills can also be acquired through digital courses. Limitations result from the quality of the examination instruments and the diagnostic findings. Additionally, economical curriculum planning can be achieved by a suitable weighting of the focus of the examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.