ArticleCase reports in pathology2021
Multiple Primary Angiosarcomas of the Colon.
Article in Case reports in pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multi-Slice Spiral CT in Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Rectal Angiosarcoma: A Case Report Highlighting Multidisciplinary Strategies for Rare Malignancies.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Postpolypectomy Bleeding Gone Wrong: Primary Colonic Epithelioid Angiosarcoma.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Synchronous Double Primary Angiosarcoma Originating from the Stomach and Rectum: A Case Report and a Literature Review.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Review
- Primary Epithelioid Angiosarcoma of the Jejunal Mesentery Causing Abdominal Bleeding: Case Report and Literature Review.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
- Primary angiosarcoma of the ascending colon diagnosed after the discovery of intraoral tumor.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastrointestinal angiosarcomas are rare and represent less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies, with most occurring in the stomach and small intestine. Occurrence in the colorectal segments is considered extremely rare.
conclusionBoth clinical and pathological diagnoses of colorectal angiosarcoma are challenging. Patients are present with nonspecific symptoms leading to mismanagement and late diagnosis. A definitive pathological diagnosis relies on immunohistochemical staining for endothelial markers. Misdiagnosis as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or GIST is possible in limited tissue biopsies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.