ArticleLabour economics2021
Hours and income dynamics during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of the Netherlands.
Article in Labour economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Productivity changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated risk factors.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025Article
- Financial well-being and financial stress as predictors of overall well-being and life satisfaction among Peruvian workers.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the after-hours dilemma: Consequences of overworking among teleworkers-A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Pandemics erode poverty alleviation process: Impact on productive livelihood and poverty return.iScience · 2023Article
- Remote work and the COVID-19 pandemic: An artificial intelligence-based topic modeling and a future agenda.Journal of business research · 2023Article
- Mobility in pandemic times: Exploring changes and long-term effects of COVID-19 on urban mobility behavior.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2022Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 recession on Mexican households: evidence from employment and time use for men, women, and children.Review of economics of the household · 2022Article
- Hours and income dynamics during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of the Netherlands.Labour economics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rUsing customized panel data spanning the entire year of 2020, we analyze the dynamics of working hours and household income across different stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. Like many other countries, during this period, the Netherlands experienced a quick spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, adopted a set of fairly strict social distancing measures, gradually reopened, and imposed another lockdown to contain the second wave. We show that socioeconomic status is strongly related to changes in working hours, especially when strict economic restrictions are in place. In contrast, household income is equally unaffected for all socioeconomic groups. Examining the drivers of these observations, we find that pandemic-specific job characteristics (the ability to work from home and essential worker status) help explain the socioeconomic gradient in total working hours. Household income is largely decoupled from shocks to working hours for employees. We provide suggestive evidence that large-scale labor hoarding schemes have helped insure employees against shocks to their employers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.