Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34545135›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2021

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of preoperative skin preparation with alcoholic chlorhexidine compared to povidone iodine in orthopedic surgery.

Mario Mastrocola, Georg Matziolis, Sabrina Böhle, Chris Lindemann, Peter Schlattmann, Henk Eijer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario MastrocolaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spital Emmental, Oberburgstrasse 54, 3400, Burgdorf, Switzerland.
Georg MatziolisOrthopaedic Department, Campus Eisenberg, Jena University Hospital, Klosterlausnitzer Str. 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany. g.matziolis@waldkliniken-eisenberg.de.
Sabrina BöhleOrthopaedic Department, Campus Eisenberg, Jena University Hospital, Klosterlausnitzer Str. 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.
Chris LindemannOrthopaedic Department, Campus Eisenberg, Jena University Hospital, Klosterlausnitzer Str. 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannDepartment of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena University Hospital, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Henk EijerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spital Emmental, Oberburgstrasse 54, 3400, Burgdorf, Switzerland.
Jena University Hospital · DERegionalspital Emmental · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative skin preparation is an effective method to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). Alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHG) and povidone iodine (PV-I) are the most widely used antiseptic agents. This meta-analysis aims to determine their efficacy in reducing natural bacterial skin flora in clean orthopedic surgery. A systematic search was conducted through current literature up to June 2021 to identify clinical randomized trials that compared the efficacy of alcoholic chlorhexidine and povidone iodine in reducing bacterial skin colonization after preoperative skin preparation. A meta-analysis was conducted. Of 235 screened articles, 8 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrate a significantly lower positive culture rate in the chlorhexidine group than in the povidone iodine group (RR = 0.53, 95% Cl: 0.32-0.88). The present data show the superiority of chlorhexidine in reducing the normal bacterial flora compared to povidone iodine in clean orthopedic surgery.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineHumansOrthopedic ProceduresPovidone-IodinePreoperative CareSkinSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinePovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID34545135
PMCPMC8452611
OpenAlexW3199083350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.