Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34545107›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Key factors affecting people's unwillingness to be confined during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a large-scale population study.

Marina Martinez-Garcia, Alejandro Rabasa, Xavier Barber, Kristina Polotskaya, Kristof Roomp, Nuria Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina Martinez-GarciaDept de matemàtiques, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, 12071, Spain.
Alejandro RabasaUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Centro de Investigación Operativa, Elche, 03202, Spain.
Xavier BarberUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Centro de Investigación Operativa, Elche, 03202, Spain.
Kristina PolotskayaUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Centro de Investigación Operativa, Elche, 03202, Spain.
Kristof RoompMicrosoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA.
Nuria OliverELLIS Unit Alicante Foundation, Alicante, Spain. nuria@alum.mit.edu.

Funding

Banco Santander FONDOS SUPERA COVID-19 Santander-CRUEFundación BBVA IA4COVID19Generalitat Valenciana Convenio subvencion Fundacion Unidad ELLIS Alicante
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population confinements have been one of the most widely adopted non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) implemented by governments across the globe to help contain the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. While confinement measures have been proven to be effective to reduce the number of infections, they entail significant economic and social costs. Thus, different policy makers and social groups have exhibited varying levels of acceptance of this type of measures. In this context, understanding the factors that determine the willingness of individuals to be confined during a pandemic is of paramount importance, particularly, to policy and decision-makers. In this paper, we study the factors that influence the unwillingness to be confined during the COVID-19 pandemic by the means of a large-scale, online population survey deployed in Spain. We perform two types of analyses (logistic regression and automatic pattern discovery) and consider socio-demographic, economic and psychological factors, together with the 14-day cumulative incidence per 100,000 inhabitants. Our analysis of 109,515 answers to the survey covers data spanning over a 5-month time period to shed light on the impact of the passage of time. We find evidence of pandemic fatigue as the percentage of those who report an unwillingness to be in confinement increases over time; we identify significant gender differences, with women being generally less likely than men to be able to sustain long-term confinement of at least 6 months; we uncover that the psychological impact was the most important factor to determine the willingness to be in confinement at the beginning of the pandemic, to be replaced by the economic impact as the most important variable towards the end of our period of study. Our results highlight the need to design gender and age specific public policies, to implement psychological and economic support programs and to address the evident pandemic fatigue as the success of potential future confinements will depend on the population's willingness to comply with them.

Indexed as

PandemicsBehaviorCOVID-19FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioPattern Recognition, AutomatedSpainStatistics as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID34545107
PMCPMC8452645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.