ArticlePediatrics2021
Half Century Since SIDS: A Reappraisal of Terminology.
Article in Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The psychological consequences of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) for the family system: A systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Prevalence and Temporal Trends of Deformational Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Finland: A Population-Based Register Study.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Safe sleep crib clinics: Promoting risk reduction strategies for sudden unexpected infant death.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Article
- Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A Potential Model for Investigation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Unexplained and Unexpected Pediatric Deaths: Forensic Review and New Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Current SIDS research: time to resolve conflicting research hypotheses and collaborate.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths: 2015-2020.Pediatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Rapid Eye Movement Sleep during Early Life: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome in Mexico, 2005-2020.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Risk and Preventive Factors for SUDI: Need We Adjust the Current Prevention Advice in a Low-Incidence Country.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Renewed Attention Needed for Prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy in the Netherlands.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
After a sudden infant death, parents and caregivers need accurate and open communication about why their infant died. Communicating tragic news about a child's death to families and caregivers is difficult. Shared and consistent terminology is essential for pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians to improve communication with families and among themselves. When families do not have complete information about why their child died, pediatricians will not be able to support them through the process and make appropriate referrals for pediatric specialty and mental health care. Families can only speculate about the cause and may blame themselves or others for the infant's death. The terminology used to describe infant deaths that occur suddenly and unexpectedly includes an assortment of terms that vary across and among pediatrician, other physician, or nonphysician clinician disciplines. Having consistent terminology is critical to improve the understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of these deaths and communicate with families. A lack of consistent terminology also makes it difficult to reliably monitor trends in mortality and hampers the ability to develop effective interventions. This report describes the history of sudden infant death terminology and summarizes the debate over the terminology and the resulting diagnostic shift of these deaths. This information is to assist pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians in caring for families during this difficult time. The importance of consistent terminology is outlined, followed by a summary of progress toward consensus. Recommendations for pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.