Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544849›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2021

Half Century Since SIDS: A Reappraisal of Terminology.

Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza, Vincent J Palusci, Benjamin Hoffman, Erich Batra, Marc Yester, Tracey S Corey, Mary Ann Sens, AAP TASK FORCE ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, COUNCIL ON INJURY, VIOLENCE, AND POISON PREVENTION, SECTION ON CHILD DEATH REVIEW AND PREVENTION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Eye Movement Sleep during Early Life: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Carrie K Shapiro-MendozaDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia CShapiroMendoza@cdc.gov.
Vincent J PalusciDepartment of Pediatrics, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York.
Benjamin HoffmanDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Erich BatraDepartments of Pediatrics and Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Marc YesterDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Tracey S CoreyFlorida Districts 5 & 24 Medical Examiner's Office, Leesburg, Florida.
Mary Ann Sens
AAP TASK FORCE ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, COUNCIL ON INJURY, VIOLENCE, AND POISON PREVENTION, SECTION ON CHILD DEATH REVIEW AND PREVENTION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USDade County Medical Examiner Department · USNew York University · USOregon Health & Science University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After a sudden infant death, parents and caregivers need accurate and open communication about why their infant died. Communicating tragic news about a child's death to families and caregivers is difficult. Shared and consistent terminology is essential for pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians to improve communication with families and among themselves. When families do not have complete information about why their child died, pediatricians will not be able to support them through the process and make appropriate referrals for pediatric specialty and mental health care. Families can only speculate about the cause and may blame themselves or others for the infant's death. The terminology used to describe infant deaths that occur suddenly and unexpectedly includes an assortment of terms that vary across and among pediatrician, other physician, or nonphysician clinician disciplines. Having consistent terminology is critical to improve the understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of these deaths and communicate with families. A lack of consistent terminology also makes it difficult to reliably monitor trends in mortality and hampers the ability to develop effective interventions. This report describes the history of sudden infant death terminology and summarizes the debate over the terminology and the resulting diagnostic shift of these deaths. This information is to assist pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians in caring for families during this difficult time. The importance of consistent terminology is outlined, followed by a summary of progress toward consensus. Recommendations for pediatricians, other physicians, and nonphysician clinicians are proposed.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathInternational Classification of DiseasesSudden Infant DeathTerminology as TopicAutopsyForensic MedicineHistory, 20th CenturyHumansInfantRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34544849
PMCPMC8487943
OpenAlexW3201021112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.