Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544693›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Patient and caregiver factors in ambulatory incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis.

Anjana E Sharma, Beatrice Huang, Stakeholder Research Advisory Council, Jan Bing Del Rosario, Janine Yang, W John Boscardin, Urmimala Sarkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient Information Needs During Ambulatory Medication Changes: A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anjana E SharmaFamily & Community Medicine, Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA anjana.sharma@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-2414
Beatrice HuangFamily & Community Medicine, Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stakeholder Research Advisory Council
Jan Bing Del RosarioDivision of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Janine YangDrexel University College of Medicine, Bakersfield, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1324-7590
W John BoscardinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Urmimala SarkarUCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4213-4405
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
Improving Survivorship Care for Diverse Cancer Patients Cared for in Safety-net SettingsK24CA212294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2017 to 2021
$831k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NCI NIH HHS K24 CA212294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients and caregivers are the primary stakeholders in ambulatory safety, given they perform daily chronic disease self-management, medication administration and outpatient follow-up. However, little attention has been given to their role in adverse events. We identified themes related to patient and caregiver factors and challenges in ambulatory safety incident reports from a Patient Safety Organization.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods analysis of ambulatory incident reports submitted to the Collaborative Healthcare Patient Safety Organization, including 450 hospitals or clinic members in 13 US states. We included events that had patient and/or caregiver behavioural, socioeconomic and clinical factors that may have contributed to the event. Two members of the team independently coded patient/caregiver factors, with dual coding of 20% of events. We then conducted a 'frequent item set' analysis to identify which factors most frequently co-occurred. We applied inductive analysis to the most frequent sets to interpret themes. Our team included a diverse stakeholder advisory council of patients, caregivers and healthcare staff.

resultsWe analysed 522 incident reports and excluded 73 for a final sample of 449 events. Our co-occurrence analysis found the following three themes: (1) clinical advice may conflict with patient priorities; (2) breakdowns in communication and patient education cause medication adverse events and (3) patients with disabilities are vulnerable to the external environment.

conclusionsAmbulatory safety reports capture both structural and behavioural factors contributing to adverse events. Actionable takeaways include the following: improving clinician counselling of patients to convey medical advice to elicit priorities, enhanced education regarding medication adverse events and expanding safety precautions for patients with disabilities at home. Ambulatory safety reporting must include patients in reporting and event review for better mitigation of future harm.

Indexed as

CaregiversRisk ManagementHospitalsHumansPatient SafetySafety Managementambulatory caremeasurement/epidemiologymedical errorpatient participationpatient safetysafety management

Identifiers

PMID34544693
PMCPMC8454446
OpenAlexW3199831361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.