ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2021
A Chatbot to Engage Parents of Preterm and Term Infants on Parental Stress, Parental Sleep, and Infant Feeding: Usability and Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03630679 (A Pilot Study Evaluating Sleep, Stress, and Infant Nutrition Using a Chatbot With Parents of Preterm and Full-term Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study Evaluating Sleep, Stress, and Infant Nutrition Using a Chatbot With Parents of Preterm and Full-term Infants
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI Engagement and Perceived Nutrition-Oriented Feeding Practices Among Urban Indonesian Mothers: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Human-Centered AI in Sleep Health Management: Scoping Review of Stakeholder Perspectives and Co-Design Practices.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Assessing the Feasibility, Usability, Acceptability, and Efficacy of an AI Chatbot for Sleep Promotion: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Interactive Conversational Agents for Perinatal Health: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- ChatGPT Yields a Passing Score on a Pediatric Board Preparatory Exam but Raises Red Flags.Global pediatric health · 2024Article
- Informatics for your Gut: at the Interface of Nutrition, the Microbiome, and Technology.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Review
- AI-based chatbot micro-intervention for parents: Meaningful engagement, learning, and efficacy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Interactivity, Quality, and Content of Websites Promoting Health Behaviors During Infancy: 6-Year Update of the Systematic Assessment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- User experience with a parenting chatbot micro intervention.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParents commonly experience anxiety, worry, and psychological distress in caring for newborn infants, particularly those born preterm. Web-based therapist services may offer greater accessibility and timely psychological support for parents but are nevertheless labor intensive due to their interactive nature. Chatbots that simulate humanlike conversations show promise for such interactive applications.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore the usability and feasibility of chatbot technology for gathering real-life conversation data on stress, sleep, and infant feeding from parents with newborn infants and to investigate differences between the experiences of parents with preterm and term infants.
methodsParents aged ≥21 years with infants aged ≤6 months were enrolled from November 2018 to March 2019. Three chatbot scripts (stress, sleep, feeding) were developed to capture conversations with parents via their mobile devices. Parents completed a chatbot usability questionnaire upon study completion. Responses to closed-ended questions and manually coded open-ended responses were summarized descriptively. Open-ended responses were analyzed using the latent Dirichlet allocation method to uncover semantic topics.
resultsOf 45 enrolled participants (20 preterm, 25 term), 26 completed the study. Parents rated the chatbot as "easy" to use (mean 4.08, SD 0.74; 1=very difficult, 5=very easy) and were "satisfied" (mean 3.81, SD 0.90; 1=very dissatisfied, 5 very satisfied). Of 45 enrolled parents, those with preterm infants reported emotional stress more frequently than did parents of term infants (33 vs 24 occasions). Parents generally reported satisfactory sleep quality. The preterm group reported feeding problems more frequently than did the term group (8 vs 2 occasions). In stress domain conversations, topics linked to "discomfort" and "tiredness" were more prevalent in preterm group conversations, whereas the topic of "positive feelings" occurred more frequently in the term group conversations. Interestingly, feeding-related topics dominated the content of sleep domain conversations, suggesting that frequent or irregular feeding may affect parents' ability to get adequate sleep or rest.
conclusionsThe chatbot was successfully used to collect real-time conversation data on stress, sleep, and infant feeding from a group of 45 parents. In their chatbot conversations, term group parents frequently expressed positive emotions, whereas preterm group parents frequently expressed physical discomfort and tiredness, as well as emotional stress. Overall, parents who completed the study gave positive feedback on their user experience with the chatbot as a tool to express their thoughts and concerns.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03630679; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03630679.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.