Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544513›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods.

Christina Zorbas, Ruby Brooks, Rebecca Bennett, Amanda Lee, Josephine Marshall, Shaan Naughton, Meron Lewis, Anna Peeters, Kathryn Backholer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. How do supermarkets shape the experience of vulnerable people in Australia's food system? A scoping review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retail Food Environment in an Urban Resettlement Colony of Delhi: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina ZorbasDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7343-2424
Ruby BrooksDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Rebecca BennettDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Amanda LeeThe University of Queensland, The School of Public Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Josephine MarshallDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Shaan NaughtonDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Meron LewisThe University of Queensland, The School of Public Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2163-0848
Anna PeetersDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kathryn BackholerDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the cost and affordability of two fortnightly diets (representing the national guidelines and current consumption) across areas containing Australia's major supermarkets.

designThe Healthy Diets Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing protocol was used.

settingPrice data were collected online and via phone calls in fifty-one urban and inner regional locations across Australia.

participantsNot applicable.

resultsHealthy diets were consistently less expensive than current (unhealthy) diets. Nonetheless, healthy diets would cost 25-26 % of the disposable income for low-income households and 30-31 % of the poverty line. Differences in gross incomes (the most available income metric which overrepresents disposable income) drove national variations in diet affordability (from 14 % of the median gross household incomes in the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory to 25 % of the median gross household income in Tasmania).

conclusionsIn Australian cities and regional areas with major supermarkets, access to affordable diets remains problematic for families receiving low incomes. These findings are likely to be exacerbated in outer regional and remote areas (not included in this study). To make healthy diets economically appealing, policies that reduce the (absolute and relative) costs of healthy diets and increase the incomes of Australians living in poverty are required.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyAustraliaCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansIncomeDiet affordabilityFood costsFood pricePrice monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34544513
PMCPMC9991756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.