Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544415›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2021

Decentralized facility financing versus performance-based payments in primary health care: a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Nigeria.

Madhulika Khanna, Benjamin Loevinsohn, Elina Pradhan, Opeyemi Fadeyibi, Kevin McGee, Oluwole Odutolu, Gyorgy Bela Fritsche, Emmanuel Meribole, Christel M J Vermeersch, Eeshani Kandpal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03890653 (Impact Evaluation of the Nigeria State Health Program Investment Credit), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03890653 naunknown statusnot on this map

Impact Evaluation of the Nigeria State Health Program Investment Credit (NSHPIC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWorld BankRan2013 to 2019Enrolled74ConditionsMaternal Care PatternsArmsPerformance-Based Financing, Decentralized Facility Financing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health system evaluation: new options, opportunities and limits.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Madhulika KhannaThe MacMillan Center, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Benjamin LoevinsohnThe Global Fund, Global Health Campus, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elina PradhanHealth, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
Opeyemi FadeyibiHealth, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 102 Yakubu Gowon Cres, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria.
Kevin McGeeDevelopment Data Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
Oluwole OdutoluHealth, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 102 Yakubu Gowon Cres, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria.
Gyorgy Bela FritscheHealth, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
Emmanuel MeriboleThe Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria, New Federal Secretariat Complex, Phase III, Ahmadu Bello Way, Central Business District, FCT, Abuja, Nigeria.
Christel M J VermeerschHealth, Nutrition and Population, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA.
Eeshani KandpalDevelopment Data Group, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA. ekandpal@worldbank.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-6296
World Bank · USWorld Health Organization - Nigeria · NGFederal Ministry of Health · NGGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CHWorld Bank Group · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth system financing presents a challenge in many developing countries. We assessed two reform packages, performance-based financing (PBF) and direct facility financing (DFF), against each other and business-as-usual for maternal and child healthcare (MCH) provision in Nigeria.

methodsWe sampled 571 facilities (269 in PBF; 302 in DFF) in 52 districts randomly assigned to PBF or DFF, and 215 facilities in 25 observable-matched control districts. PBF facilities received $2 ($1 for operating grants plus $1 for bonuses) for every $1 received by DFF facilities (operating grants alone). Both received autonomy, supervision, and enhanced community engagement, isolating the impact of additional performance-linked facility and health worker payments. Facilities and households with recent pregnancies in facility catchments were surveyed at baseline (2014) and endline (2017). Outcomes were Penta3 immunization, institutional deliveries, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), four-plus antenatal care (ANC) visits, insecticide-treated mosquito net (ITN) use by under-fives, and directly observed quality of care (QOC). We estimated difference-in-differences with state fixed effects and clustered standard errors.

resultsPBF increased institutional deliveries by 10% points over DFF and 7% over business-as-usual (p<0.01). PBF and DFF were more effective than business-as-usual for Penta3 (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively); PBF also for mCPR (p<0.05). Twenty-one of 26 QOC indicators improved in both PBF and DFF relative to business-as-usual (p<0.05). However, except for deliveries, PBF was as or less effective than DFF: Penta3 immunization and ITN use were each 6% less than DFF (p<0.1 for both) and QOC gains were also comparable. Utilization gains come from the middle of the rural wealth distribution (p<0.05).

conclusionsOur findings show that both PBF and DFF represent significant improvements over business-as-usual for service provision and quality of care. However, except for institutional delivery, PBF and DFF do not differ from each other despite PBF disbursing $2 for every dollar disbursed by DFF. These findings highlight the importance of direct facility financing and decentralization in improving PHC and suggest potential complementarities between the two approaches in strengthening MCH service delivery.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03890653 ; May 8, 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareReimbursement, IncentiveChildFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansNigeriaPregnancyQuality of Health CareHealth financingMaternal and child healthNigeriaQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID34544415
PMCPMC8452448
OpenAlexW3200644889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.