Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544408›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

A decade of commitment to hospital quality of care: overview of and perceptions on multicomponent quality improvement policies involving accreditation, public reporting, inspection and pay-for-performance.

Astrid Van Wilder, Jonas Brouwers, Bianca Cox, Luk Bruyneel, Dirk De Ridder, Fien Claessens, Kristof Eeckloo, Kris Vanhaecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hospital accreditation: an umbrella review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Effective waste management in service industry: Fuzzy-based modelling approach for strategic decision-making.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Astrid Van Wilder *Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Astrid.vanwilder@kuleuven.be.
Jonas Brouwers *Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bianca CoxLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Luk BruyneelLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk De RidderLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fien ClaessensLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristof EecklooStrategic Policy Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement (QI) initiatives such as accreditation, public reporting, inspection and pay-for-performance are increasingly being implemented globally. In Flanders, Belgium, a government policy for acute-care hospitals incorporates aforementioned initiatives. Currently, questions are raised on the sustainability of the present policy.

objectiveFirst, to summarise the various initiatives hospitals have adopted under government encouragement between 2008 and 2019. Second, to study the perspectives of healthcare stakeholders on current government policy.

methodsIn this multi-method study, we collected data on QI initiative implementation from governmental and institutional sources and through an online survey among hospital quality managers. We compiled an overview of QI initiative implementation for all Flemish acute-care hospitals between 2008 (n = 62) and 2019 (n = 53 after hospital mergers). Stakeholder perspectives were assessed via a second survey available to all healthcare employees and a focus group with healthcare policy experts was consulted. Variation between professions was assessed.

resultsQI initiatives have been increasingly implemented, especially from 2016 onwards, with the majority (87%) of hospitals having obtained a first accreditation label and all hospitals publicly reporting performance indicators, receiving regular inspections and having entered the pay-for-performance initiative. On the topic of external international accreditation, overall attitudes within the survey were predominantly neutral (36.2%), while 34.5% expressed positive and 29.3% negative views towards accreditation. In examining specific professional groups in-depth, we learned 58% of doctors regarded accreditation negatively, while doctors were judged to be the largest contributors to quality according to the majority of respondents.

conclusionsHospitals have demonstrated increased efforts into QI, especially since 2016, while perceptions on currently implemented QI initiatives among healthcare stakeholders are heterogeneous. To assure quality of care remains a top-priority for acute-care hospitals, we recommend a revision of the current multicomponent quality policy where the adoption of all initiatives is streamlined and co-created bottom-up.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementReimbursement, IncentiveAccreditationHospitalsHumansPerceptionPolicyAccreditationHospitalPublic reporting of healthcare dataQuality controlQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34544408
PMCPMC8450175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.