Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544405›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Older patients' perspectives on factors contributing to frequent visits to the emergency department: a qualitative interview study.

Daisy Kolk, Anton F Kruiswijk, Janet L MacNeil-Vroomen, Milan L Ridderikhof, Bianca M Buurman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daisy KolkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands. d.kolk@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-5323
Anton F KruiswijkInternal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Janet L MacNeil-VroomenInternal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Milan L RidderikhofAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bianca M BuurmanInternal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients are at high risk of unplanned revisits to the emergency department (ED) because of their medical complexity. To reduce the number of ED visits, we need more knowledge about the patient-level, environmental, and healthcare factors involved. The aim of this study was to describe older patients' perspectives and experiences before and after an ED visit, and to identify factors that possibly contribute to frequent ED revisits.

methodsThis was a qualitative description study. We performed semi-structured individual interviews with older patients who frequently visited the ED and were discharged home after an acute visit. Patients were enrolled in the ED of a university medical centre using purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded independently by two researchers. Theoretical analysis was used to identify recurring patterns and themes in the data. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached.

resultsIn-depth interviews were completed with 13 older patients. Three main themes emerged: 1) medical events leading to feelings of crisis, 2) patients' untreated health problems, and 3) persistent problems in health and daily functioning post discharge. Participants identified problems before and after their ED visit that possibly contributed to further ED visits. These problems included increasing symptoms leading to feelings of crisis, the relationship with the general practitioner, incomplete discharge information at the ED, and inadequate follow-up and lack of recovery after an ED visit.

conclusionsThis qualitative study identified multiple factors that may contribute to frequent ED visits among older patients. Older patients in need of acute care might benefit from hospital-at-home interventions, or acute care provided by geriatric emergency teams in the primary care setting. Identifying frailty in the ED is needed to improve discharge communication and adequate follow-up is needed to improve recovery after an acute ED visit.

Indexed as

AftercarePatient DischargeAgedEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAcute careAgedGeriatricsPatient experiencesQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34544405
PMCPMC8454044
OpenAlexW3200090513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.