Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544377›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2021

Imaging mass cytometry for high-dimensional tissue profiling in the eye.

Anja Schlecht, Stefaniya Boneva, Henrike Salie, Saskia Killmer, Julian Wolf, Rozina Ida Hajdu, Claudia Auw-Haedrich, Hansjürgen Agostini, Thomas Reinhard, Günther Schlunck and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hyalocytes-guardians of the vitreoretinal interface.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  7. Immune Cytolytic Activity and Strategies for Therapeutic Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Hyalocyte origin, structure, and imaging.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anja SchlechtFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefaniya BonevaFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Henrike SalieFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Saskia KillmerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julian WolfFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Rozina Ida HajduFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Claudia Auw-HaedrichFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Hansjürgen AgostiniFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas ReinhardFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Günther SchlunckFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Bertram BengschFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Infectious Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Clemens Ak LangeFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, University of Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. clemens.lange@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DESemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImaging mass cytometry (IMC) combines the principles of flow cytometry and mass spectrometry (MS) with laser scanning spatial resolution and offers unique advantages for the analysis of tissue samples in unprecedented detail. In contrast to conventional immunohistochemistry, which is limited in its application by the number of possible fluorochrome combinations, IMC uses isoptope-coupled antibodies that allow multiplex analysis of up to 40 markers in the same tissue section simultaneously.

methodsIn this report we use IMC to analyze formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded conjunctival tissue. We performed a 18-biomarkers IMC analysis of conjunctival tissue to determine and summarize the possibilities, relevance and limitations of IMC for deciphering the biology and pathology of ocular diseases.

resultsWithout modifying the manufacturer's protocol, we observed positive and plausible staining for 12 of 18 biomarkers. Subsequent bioinformatical single-cell analysis and phenograph clustering identified 24 different cellular clusters with distinct expression profiles with respect to the markers used.

conclusionsIMC enables highly multiplexed imaging of ocular samples at subcellular resolution. IMC is an innovative and feasible method, providing new insights into ocular disease pathogenesis that will be valuable for basic research, drug discovery and clinical diagnostics.

Indexed as

Image CytometryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedFlow CytometryMass SpectrometryStaining and Labelingconjunctival melanomaImaging mass cytometryIMCmulti-dimensional cellular profiling

Identifiers

PMID34544377
PMCPMC8454101
OpenAlexW3199874472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.