Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544195›Full record

ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2021

[Living wills of residents in nursing homes - which treatment situations and treatment measures are decreed?]

Malte Klemmt, Silke Neuderth, Birgitt van Oorschot, Tanja Henking

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. [Familiarity with and Dissemination of Advance Directives in Germany: Results of a Representative Survey of the General Population].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  6. [Knowledge and misconceptions on advance directives-results of a citizen survey].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malte KlemmtInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt.
Silke NeuderthInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt.
Birgitt van OorschotInterdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg.
Tanja HenkingInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe possibility of using a living will to influence later treatment in the event of incapacity to consent is nowadays an important element in safeguarding patients' autonomy at the end of life. Refusing or consenting treatment measures in advance of treatment is of particular importance for nursing home residents, not only against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a survey of all resident-documents in 13 nursing homes of different sizes and service providers in the city and district of Wuerzburg. The documents were analysed according to a deductive-inductive procedure using categorical summaries and descriptive frequency counts.

resultsIn 265 recorded living wills, 2072 treatment situations and 1673 treatment measures could be identified. Residents largely agree to symptom-relieving and nursing measures and often reject life-prolonging or life-substaining treatment measures, the latter mostly being limited to specific, defined situations. The reference to certain treatment situations regarding resuscitation attempts, both in the form of refusal and consent, was identified in 88.6 % of the living wills. 62 % of the living wills could be assigned to a template. DISCUSSION: The study provides information about the content of living wills of nursing home residents. It thus provides information on medical treatment preferences in the case of incapacity to consent and shows that treatment measures (including resuscitation) are mostly related to specific treatment situations.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesCOVID-19GermanyHumansLiving WillsResuscitation OrdersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34544195
PMCPMC8514265
OpenAlexW3199831503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.