ArticleThe Journal of chiropractic education2021
Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 1: Origins of the conflict.
Article in The Journal of chiropractic education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Awareness of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Act Governing Chiropractic in Malaysia: A Survey of Adults in Klang Valley.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2023Article
- Chiropractic Day 2023: A Report and Qualitative Analysis of How Thought Leaders Celebrate the Present and Envision the Future of Chiropractic.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2023Article
- The John A. Sweaney Lecture: Virtual, September 2021, Given by Dr Michele Maiers. A Time to Lead: Reflections During a Pandemic.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2022Article
- Education Descriptive Reports: How to Publish Pragmatic Studies in Education.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2022Review
- Exploring Diverse Career Paths and Recommendations for Celebrating Chiropractic Day 2021: A Narrative Inquiry.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 6: Preparing for the lawsuit.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Authors' introduction.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 8: Judgment impact.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 7: Lawsuit and decisions.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 2: Rise of the American Medical Association.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Overview.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 5: Evidence exposed.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 4: Committee on Quackery.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis paper is the first in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the AMA and the origins of chiropractic and to explore how the AMA began its monopoly of health care in the United States, possible reasons that organized medicine acted against chiropractic, and how these events influenced the chiropractic profession.
methodsThis historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. We used primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers that follow a successive time line. This paper is the first of the series and explores the origins of the aversion of organized American medicine to other health professions and the origins of the chiropractic profession.
resultsThe AMA began in the mid-1800s to unify like-minded "regular" medical physicians who developed a code of ethics and promoted higher educational standards. Their efforts to unify had excluded other types of health care providers, which they called "irregular" practitioners. However, Americans were seeking more natural alternatives to the harsh methods that regular medical physicians offered at that time. Nearly 50 years after the AMA began, the chiropractic profession attempted to emerge during a time when many patients valued vitalism and their freedom to choose what health care provider they would access.
conclusionDuring the years that chiropractic developed as a healing profession, organized medicine was already well established and developing a monopoly in American health care. These events created the foundation on which the tensions between these professions were built and ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.