ArticleThe Journal of chiropractic education2021
Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.
Article in The Journal of chiropractic education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole health and chiropractic: a commentary on historical roots, contemporary relevance, and future directions.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Article
- Public Awareness of the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Act Governing Chiropractic in Malaysia: A Survey of Adults in Klang Valley.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2023Article
- Chiropractic Day 2023: A Report and Qualitative Analysis of How Thought Leaders Celebrate the Present and Envision the Future of Chiropractic.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2023Article
- The John A. Sweaney Lecture: Virtual, September 2021, Given by Dr Michele Maiers. A Time to Lead: Reflections During a Pandemic.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2022Article
- Education Descriptive Reports: How to Publish Pragmatic Studies in Education.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2022Review
- Exploring Diverse Career Paths and Recommendations for Celebrating Chiropractic Day 2021: A Narrative Inquiry.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 1: Origins of the conflict.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 8: Judgment impact.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 7: Lawsuit and decisions.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 2: Rise of the American Medical Association.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Overview.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 5: Evidence exposed.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 4: Committee on Quackery.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 6: Preparing for the lawsuit.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
- Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Authors' introduction.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the growth of chiropractic, its public relations campaigns, and infighting that contributed to the events surrounding the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.
methodsThis historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the third of the series that explores the growth the chiropractic profession.
resultsBy the 1930s, the AMA was already under investigation for violation of antitrust laws and the National Chiropractic Association was suggesting that the AMA was establishing a health care monopoly. Chiropractic schools grew and the number of graduates rose quickly. Public relations campaigns and publications in the popular press attempted to educate the public about chiropractic. Factions within the profession polarized around differing views of how they thought that chiropractic should be practiced and portrayed to the public. The AMA leaders noted the infighting and used it to their advantage to subvert chiropractic.
conclusionChiropractic grew rapidly and established its presence with the American public through public relations campaigns and popular press. However, infighting would give the AMA material to further its efforts to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.