Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544126›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Horizontal transmission and recombination of Wolbachia in the butterfly tribe Aeromachini Tutt, 1906 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae).

Zimiao Zhao, Jianqing Zhu, Ary A Hoffmann, Lijun Cao, Li Shen, Jie Fang, Shuojia Ma, Qunxiu Liu, Weidong Yu, Liying Tang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MixedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. UsingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zimiao ZhaoLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Jianqing ZhuShanghai Zoological Park, Shanghai 200335, People's Republic of China.
Ary A HoffmannSchool of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Lijun CaoInstitute of Plant and Environmental Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, People's Republic of China.
Li ShenLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Jie FangLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Shuojia MaLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Qunxiu LiuShanghai Zoological Park, Shanghai 200335, People's Republic of China.
Weidong YuLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Liying TangLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Yongqiang WangLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.
Weibin JiangLaboratory of Environmental Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5548-7253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia is arguably one of the most ubiquitous heritable symbionts among insects and understanding its transmission dynamics is crucial for understanding why it is so common. While previous research has studied the transmission pathways of Wolbachia in several insect lineages including Lepidoptera, this study takes advantage of data collected from the lepidopteran tribe Aeromachini in an effort to assess patterns of transmission. Twenty-one of the 46 species of Aeromachini species were infected with Wolbachia. Overall, 25% (31/125) of Aeromachini specimens tested were Wolbachia positive. All Wolbachia strains were species-specific except for the wJho strain which appeared to be shared by three host species with a sympatric distribution based on a cophylogenetic comparison between Wolbachia and the Aeromachini species. Two tests of phylogenetic congruence did not find any evidence for cospeciation between Wolbachia strains and their butterfly hosts. The cophylogenetic comparison, divergence time estimation, and Wolbachia recombination analysis revealed that Wolbachia acquisition in Aeromachini appears to have mainly occurred mainly through horizontal transmission rather than codivergence.

Indexed as

ButterfliesWolbachiaAnimalsPhylogenyRecombination, GeneticSpecies SpecificityAeromachinicophylogenydivergence timehorizontal transmissionrecombinationWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID34544126
PMCPMC8496314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.