Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34544067›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

Uniqueness of shear wave modeling in an incompressible, transversely isotropic (ITI) material.

Ned C Rouze, Anna E Knight, Kathryn R Nightingale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ned C RouzeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.
Anna E KnightDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.
Kathryn R NightingaleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.

Funding

Radiation Force Imaging of Prostate Cancer and Guidance of Biopsy ProceduresR01CA142824 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2010 to 2021
$4.4M
Improved ultrasound imaging using elevated acoustic outputR01EB022106 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142824NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five material parameters are required to describe a transversely isotropic (TI) material including two Poisson's ratios that characterize the compressibility of the material. Both Poisson's ratios must be specified to model an incompressible, TI (ITI) material. However, a previous analysis of the procedure used to evaluate the incompressible limit in a two-dimensional (2D) space of Poisson's ratios has shown that elements of the stiffness tensor are not unique in this limit, and that an additional, fourth parameter is required to model these elements for an ITI material. In this study, we extend this analysis to the case of shear wave propagation in an ITI material. Shear wave signals are modeled using analytic Green's tensor methods to express the signals in terms of the phase velocity and polarization vectors of the shear horizontal (SH) and shear vertical (SV) propagation modes. In contrast to the previous result, the current analysis demonstrates that the phase velocity and polarization vectors are independent of the procedure used to evaluate the 2D limit of Poisson's ratios without the need to include an additional parameter. Thus, calculated shear wave signals are unique and can be used for comparison with experimental measurements to determine all three model parameters that characterize an ITI material.

Indexed as

incompressible limitshear wavetransversely isotropic material

Identifiers

PMID34544067
PMCPMC8605801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.