Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543588›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2021

Measuring the COVID-19 Mortality Burden in the United States : A Microsimulation Study.

Julian Reif, Hanke Heun-Johnson, Bryan Tysinger, Darius Lakdawalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The burden of cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Health Risk and the Value of Life.Journal of public economics · 2025
    Article
  6. Heterogeneity in Damages from A Pandemic.The review of economics and statistics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian ReifUniversity of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.R.).
Hanke Heun-JohnsonUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (H.H., B.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-4101-2492
Bryan TysingerUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (H.H., B.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-8497-3664
Darius LakdawallaUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-5934-8042

Funding

Ensuring Access to Novel Alzheimer’s and Dementia Treatments: Evaluating Innovative Payment ApproachesR01AG062277 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDMAN, DANA P, LAKDAWALLA, DARIUS N. · 2018 to 2021
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFully assessing the mortality burden of the COVID-19 pandemic requires measuring years of life lost (YLLs) and accounting for quality-of-life differences.

objectiveTo measure YLLs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost from the COVID-19 pandemic, by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity.

designState-transition microsimulation model. DATA SOURCES: Health and Retirement Study, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, data on excess deaths from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and nursing home death counts from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. TARGET POPULATION: U.S. population aged 25 years and older. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Individual.

interventionCOVID-19 pandemic through 13 March 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: YLLs and QALYs lost per 10 000 persons in the population. The estimates account for the age, sex, and race/ethnicity of decedents, along with obesity, smoking behavior, lung disease, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, hypertension, dementia, and nursing home residence. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in 6.62 million QALYs lost (9.08 million YLLs) through 13 March 2021, with 3.6 million (54%) lost by those aged 25 to 64 years. The greatest toll was on Black and Hispanic communities, especially among men aged 65 years or older, who lost 1138 and 1371 QALYs, respectively, per 10 000 persons. Absent the pandemic, 38% of decedents would have had average or above-average life expectancies for their subgroup defined by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Accounting for uncertainty in risk factors for death from COVID-19 yielded similar results. LIMITATION: Estimates may vary depending on assumptions about mortality and quality-of-life projections.

conclusionBeyond excess deaths alone, the COVID-19 pandemic imposed a greater life expectancy burden on persons aged 25 to 64 years, including those with average or above-average life expectancies, and a disproportionate burden on Black and Hispanic communities. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdultAgedAge DistributionComorbidityCost of IllnessCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEpidemiological ModelsEthnic and Racial MinoritiesFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34543588
PMCPMC8462514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.