Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543516›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2021

The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults.

Ifrah Zawar, Balu Krishnan, Michael Mackow, Andreas Alexopoulos, Dileep Nair, Vineet Punia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ifrah ZawarEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6103-4250
Balu KrishnanEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1897-3359
Michael MackowEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andreas AlexopoulosEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Dileep NairEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Vineet PuniaEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0552-6736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe gold standard for the management of drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age.

methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively).

resultsMean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection.

conclusionOur study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain-responsive neurostimulation was well-tolerated in older adults.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDrug Resistant EpilepsyAgedBrainElectrodes, ImplantedHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesbrain-responsive neurostimulationepilepsyolder adultsRNS System

Identifiers

PMID34543516
PMCPMC8633477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.