Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543346›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Reference and point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency: Blood disorder interference, contrived specimens, and fingerstick equivalence and precision.

Sampa Pal, Jane Myburgh, Pooja Bansil, Amanda Hann, Lynn Robertson, Emily Gerth-Guyette, Gwen Ambler, Greg Bizilj, Maria Kahn, Stephanie Zobrist and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04010695 nacompletednot on this map

Validation of Diagnostics to Identify Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity in the US

TypeinterventionalSponsorPATHRan2019 to 2019Enrolled250ConditionsG6PD DeficiencyArmsSD Biosensor G6PD Analyzer, Pointe Scientific Test Kit, HemoCue System
NCT04054661 nacompletednot on this map

Validation of a Diagnostic Test for Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Diagnostic Accuracy and Repeatability in Capillary Samples

TypeinterventionalSponsorPATHRan2019 to 2020Enrolled229ConditionsG6PD DeficiencyArmsSD Biosensor STANDARD G6PD Test, Pointe Scientific Test Kit, HemoCue System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sampa PalPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jane MyburghSpecial Haematology Laboratory, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pooja BansilPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Amanda HannSpecial Haematology Laboratory, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Lynn RobertsonSpecial Haematology Laboratory, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Emily Gerth-GuyettePATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Gwen AmblerPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Greg BiziljPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Maria KahnPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Stephanie ZobristPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9436-9885
Michelle R ManisDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nickolas A StykeDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Vajra AllanPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Richard AnsbroConsultant, London, United Kingdom.
Tobi AkingbadeVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Andrew BryanDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Sean C MurphyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
James G KublinVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Mark LaytonSpecial Haematology Laboratory, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-4395
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain clinical indications and treatments such as the use of rasburicase in cancer therapy and 8-aminoquinolines for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment would benefit from a point-of-care test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Three studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of one such test: the STANDARD™ G6PD Test (SD BIOSENSOR, South Korea). First, biological interference on the test performance was evaluated in specimens with common blood disorders, including high white blood cell (WBC) counts. Second, the test precision on fingerstick specimens was evaluated against five individuals of each, deficient, intermediate, and normal G6PD activity status. Third, clinical performance of the test was evaluated at three point-of-care settings in the United States. The test performed equivalently to the reference assay in specimens with common blood disorders. High WBC count blood samples resulted in overestimation of G6PD activity in both the reference assay and the STANDARD G6PD Test. The STANDARD G6PD Test showed good precision on multiple fingerstick specimens from the same individual. The same G6PD threshold values (U/g Hb) were applied for a semiquantitative interpretation for fingerstick- and venous-derived results. The sensitivity/specificity values (95% confidence intervals) for the test for G6PD deficiency were 100 (92.3-100.0)/97 (95.2-98.2) and 100 (95.7-100.0)/97.4 (95.7-98.5) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The same values for females with intermediate (> 30% to ≤ 70%) G6PD activity were 94.1 (71.3-99.9)/88.2 (83.9-91.7) and 82.4 (56.6-96.2)/87.6(83.3-91.2) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The STANDARD G6PD Test enables point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBlood Specimen CollectionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHematologic DiseasesHemoglobinsHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseHemoglobinsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34543346
PMCPMC8452025
OpenAlexW3201415152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.