ArticlePloS one2021
Reference and point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency: Blood disorder interference, contrived specimens, and fingerstick equivalence and precision.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validation of Diagnostics to Identify Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity in the US
Validation of a Diagnostic Test for Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Diagnostic Accuracy and Repeatability in Capillary Samples
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on glucose- 6 - phosphate dehydrogenase activities measured by a semi-quantitative handheld biosensor.Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care standard G6PD test™ (SD Biosensor) for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Malaria journal · 2024Pooled it
- Performance evaluation of an automated method for accurate identification of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency on the BS-2800M analyzer.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Portable Point-of-Care Device for Dual Detection of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Hemoglobin in Low-Resource Settings.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Unexpected Rasburicase-Induced Hemolysis in a Patient With Normal Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity.Journal of medical cases · 2024Article
- Article
- Expanding the roles of community health workers to sustain programmes during malaria elimination: a meeting report on operational research in Southeast Asia.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Field assessment of the operating procedures of a semi-quantitative G6PD Biosensor to improve repeatability of routine testing.PloS one · 2024Article
- Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Assessing the Operational Feasibility of Integrating Point-of-Care G6PD Testing intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Review of the Current Status of G6PD Deficiency Testing to Guide Radical Cure Treatment for Vivax Malaria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Measurement Using Biosensors by Community-Based Village Malaria Workers and Hospital Laboratory Staff in Cambodia: A Quantitative Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Technical evaluation and usability of a quantitative G6PD POC test in cord blood: a mixed-methods study in a low-resource setting.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Genetic Variants of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and Their Associated Enzyme Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld quantitative G6PD diagnostic.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Certain clinical indications and treatments such as the use of rasburicase in cancer therapy and 8-aminoquinolines for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment would benefit from a point-of-care test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Three studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of one such test: the STANDARD™ G6PD Test (SD BIOSENSOR, South Korea). First, biological interference on the test performance was evaluated in specimens with common blood disorders, including high white blood cell (WBC) counts. Second, the test precision on fingerstick specimens was evaluated against five individuals of each, deficient, intermediate, and normal G6PD activity status. Third, clinical performance of the test was evaluated at three point-of-care settings in the United States. The test performed equivalently to the reference assay in specimens with common blood disorders. High WBC count blood samples resulted in overestimation of G6PD activity in both the reference assay and the STANDARD G6PD Test. The STANDARD G6PD Test showed good precision on multiple fingerstick specimens from the same individual. The same G6PD threshold values (U/g Hb) were applied for a semiquantitative interpretation for fingerstick- and venous-derived results. The sensitivity/specificity values (95% confidence intervals) for the test for G6PD deficiency were 100 (92.3-100.0)/97 (95.2-98.2) and 100 (95.7-100.0)/97.4 (95.7-98.5) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The same values for females with intermediate (> 30% to ≤ 70%) G6PD activity were 94.1 (71.3-99.9)/88.2 (83.9-91.7) and 82.4 (56.6-96.2)/87.6(83.3-91.2) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The STANDARD G6PD Test enables point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.