Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543332›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

First-line treatment for lung cancer among Japanese older patients: A real-world analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data.

Shoko Noda-Narita, Asuka Kawachi, Ayako Okuyama, Ryo Sadachi, Akihiro Hirakawa, Yasushi Goto, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Takahiro Higashi, Kan Yonemori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shoko Noda-NaritaDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0203-973X
Asuka KawachiDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayako OkuyamaCenter for Cancer Registries, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo SadachiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro HirakawaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi GotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro FujiwaraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro HigashiCenter for Cancer Registries, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kan YonemoriDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging of the population has led to an increase in the prevalence of cancer among older adults. In Japan, single agent chemotherapy was recommended for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for those, who were aged ≥75 years, while the Western guidelines did not recommend a specific regimen. In clinical practice, physicians are required to decide the treatment based on a lack of enough evidence. This study aimed to examine the prescribing patterns of first-line chemotherapy according to age in the real-world practice. Data from the survey database of Diagnostic Procedure Combination and hospital-based cancer registries of designated cancer centers nationwide were used. The first-line chemotherapy regimens among 9,737 patients who were diagnosed with advanced lung cancer between January and December 2013, were identified and compared based on age. We found that the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy decreased with age; 80.0%, 70.4%, 50.6%, and 30.2% of patients aged 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, and ≥ 85 years, respectively, received chemotherapy. Among them, platinum doublets were prescribed for 62.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 70 years, and 60.7% of the patients who were aged ≥ 75 years with no driver mutations in NSCLC; only 37.6% of them received single agents. Patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also preferred platinum doublets (35.6%). Carboplatin was commonly prescribed in all age groups; only 28.4% of those receiving platinum doublets selected cisplatin. In this study, platinum doublets were identified as the most commonly prescribed regimen in those who were aged ≥ 70 years. Despite recommendations of Japanese guidelines for NSCLC, 60.7% of those who were aged ≥75 years received platinum doublets. Additionally, patients who were aged ≥ 80 years also received systemic chemotherapy, including platinum doublets; age did not solely influence regimen selection.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCisplatinDatabases, FactualFemaleGuidelines as TopicHospitalsHumansJapanLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinPlatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34543332
PMCPMC8452055
OpenAlexW3200865359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.