Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543138›Full record

ArticleHuman factors2023

Decision Making Within and Outside Standard Operating Procedures: Paradoxical Use of Operational Discretion in Firefighters.

Philip C Butler, Andy Bowers, Andrew P Smith, Sabrina R Cohen-Hatton, Robert C Honey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip C ButlerCardiff University, UK.
Andy BowersUniversity of Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK.
Andrew P SmithCardiff University, UK.
Sabrina R Cohen-HattonCardiff University, UK.
Robert C HoneyCardiff University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how firefighters' use of rules (i.e., standard operating procedures [SOPs]) and deliberative decision making (i.e., operational discretion [OD]) interacts with acute stress.

backgroundCurrent operational guidance for UK firefighters combines the provision of SOPs, for routine incidents, with the use of OD, under prescribed conditions (e.g., when there is a risk to human life). However, our understanding of the use of SOPs and OD is limited.

methodsIncident commanders (ICs;

resultsICs were

conclusionSOPs and OD were not used in the manner prescribed by current operational guidance in simulated emergency incidents. APPLICATION: These results suggest that firefighter training in SOPs and OD should be augmented alongside personal resilience training, given the impact of stress on health and wellbeing, but also to improve the deployment of SOPs and OD under stress.

Indexed as

FirefightersDecision MakingHumansSelf Reportacute stressemergency servicesoperational discretionSOPs

Identifiers

PMID34543138
PMCPMC10626990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.