Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34543085›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2022

Surgical Management of Focal Chondral Defects of the Talus: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Hanno Schenker, Jörg Eschweiler, Arne Driessen, Matthias Knobe, Markus Tingart, Alice Baroncini

Open access · hybridAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical management of focal chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Retrograde drilling for ankle joint osteochondral lesions: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Cell therapies for chondral defects of the talus: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Additional cartilage treatment for small defects in chronic ankle instability shows no mid-term benefit and delays recovery: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Advancements in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-1221
Nicola MaffulliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi (SA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-3702
Hanno SchenkerDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Arne DriessenDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Matthias KnobeDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Markus TingartDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Alice BaronciniDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Lucerne · CHUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo consensus has been reached regarding the optimal surgical treatment for focal chondral defects of the talus. PURPOSE: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical scores and complications of mosaicplasty, osteochondral auto- and allograft transplant, microfracture, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplant, and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the talus at midterm follow-up. STUDY

designBayesian network meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsThis Bayesian network meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were accessed in February 2021. All clinical trials comparing 2 or more surgical interventions for the management of chondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, rate of failure, and rate of revision surgery. The network meta-analysis were performed through the routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. The log odds ratio (LOR) effect measure was used for dichotomous variables, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables.

resultsData from 13 articles (521 procedures) were retrieved. The median length of the follow-up was 47.8 months (range, 31.7-66.8 months). Analysis of variance revealed no difference between the treatment groups at baseline in terms of age, sex, body mass index, AOFAS score, VAS score, and mean number of defects. AMIC demonstrated the greatest AOFAS score (SMD, 11.27) and lowest VAS score (SMD, -2.26) as well as the lowest rates of failure (LOR, 0.94) and revision (LOR, 0.94). The test for overall inconsistency was not significant.

conclusionAt approximately 4 years of follow-up, the AMIC procedure for management of focal chondral defects of the talus produced the best outcome.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesTalusBayes TheoremChondrogenesisHumansTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeAMICchondral defectOATtalus

Identifiers

PMID34543085
PMCPMC9354066
OpenAlexW3200685849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.