Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542864›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Proteomic Tools for the Analysis of Cytoskeleton Proteins.

Carlos Barreto, Andriele Silva, Eliza Wiech, Antonio Lopez, Avdar San, Shaneen Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. In Silico Analysis of aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos BarretoDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Andriele SilvaDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Eliza WiechDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Antonio LopezDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Avdar SanDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Shaneen SinghDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA. Ssingh@brooklyn.cuny.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic analyses have become an essential part of the toolkit of the molecular biologist, given the widespread availability of genomic data and open source or freely accessible bioinformatics software. Tools are available for detecting homologous sequences, recognizing functional domains, and modeling the three-dimensional structure for any given protein sequence, as well as for predicting interactions with other proteins or macromolecules. Although a wealth of structural and functional information is available for many cytoskeletal proteins, with representatives spanning all of the major subfamilies, the majority of cytoskeletal proteins remain partially or totally uncharacterized. Moreover, bioinformatics tools provide a means for studying the effects of synthetic mutations or naturally occurring variants of these cytoskeletal proteins. This chapter discusses various freely available proteomic analysis tools, with a focus on in silico prediction of protein structure and function. The selected tools are notable for providing an easily accessible interface for the novice while retaining advanced functionality for more experienced computational biologists.

Indexed as

ProteomicsComputational BiologyCytoskeletal ProteinsCytoskeletonSequence AlignmentSoftwareCytoskeletal ProteinsComparative modelingDocking analysisHomology modelingMultiple sequence alignmentProtein domainsProtein-protein interactionsProteomicsSecondary structure predictionSequence similarityStructure analysisThreading

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.