Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542733›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Effect of dietary phytobiotic mixture on growth performance, nutrient utilization, and immunity in weaned piglets.

Arup Kumar Samanta, Jagan Mohanrao Gali, Tapan Kumar Dutta, Tridib Kumar Rajkhowa, Guru Prasad Mandal, Amlan Kumar Patra

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arup Kumar SamantaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, 796015, India. aksamanta73@gmail.com.
Jagan Mohanrao GaliDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, 796015, India.
Tapan Kumar DuttaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, 796015, India.
Tridib Kumar RajkhowaDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, 796015, India.
Guru Prasad MandalDepartment of Animal Nutrition, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Belgachia, Kolkata, 700037, India.
Amlan Kumar PatraDepartment of Animal Nutrition, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Belgachia, Kolkata, 700037, India. patra_amlan@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1410-0902
Central Agricultural University · INWest Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of dietary phytobiotic mixture on growth performance, blood profiles, immune response, and fecal microorganisms in weaned piglets. Twenty four weaned crossbred piglets were equally divided into four groups in a completely randomized design. The animals in 4 groups were fed a basal diet added with (1) no antibiotics and phytobiotics (CON), (2) bacitracin (0.5 g/kg; AB), (3) a blend of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Trachyspermum copticum essential oils (0.3 g/kg and 0.4 g/kg, respectively; EO), and (4) plant extracts (PEO) of Mikania micrantha and Garcinia lanceifolia (2.8 g/kg and 1.4 g/kg, respectively) and C. zeylanicum and T. copticum essential oils (0.3 g/kg and 0.4 g/kg, respectively). Inclusion of AB, EO, and PEO did not affect final body weight, average daily gain, feed intake, feed efficiency, and nutrient digestibility. Compared with the CON, serum protein profiles were not affected, but a few lipid profiles were improved, particularly cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein in the EO and PEO groups. Lymphocyte proliferation index and concentrations of IgG and IgA and TNF-α were not affected by any treatments. The concentrations of IgM increased (P = 0.04) at 28 days and tended to increase (P = 0.10) at 56 days in the EO group. Serum IL-1β levels decreased on days 28 and 56 in the EO and PEO groups. Fecal Lactobacilli population generally increased (P < 0.01) in the AB, EO, and PEO groups compared with the CON. Fecal enterobacterial numbers were always greater for AB than for CON, EO, or PEO, but enterobacterial populations were sometimes lower in the EO group than the CON group. In conclusion, dietary EO or PEO has no effect on the growth performance, but it may improve a few lipid profiles, immune responses, and fecal microbial populations in piglets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietary SupplementsAnimalsDietNutrientsSwineWeaningNutrientsFecal microbesGrowth performanceImmunityLipid profilePhytobioticsPiglets

Identifiers

PMID34542733
OpenAlexW3200635859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.