Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542672›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group.

Paul W Hodges, Jeannie F Bailey, Maryse Fortin, Michele C Battié

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06974721 (Wearable Flexible Sensors for Spinal Motion Monitoring in Spinal Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974721 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Wearable Flexible Sensors for Spinal Motion Monitoring in Spinal Diseases

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPeking University Third HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsSpine Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is fatty infiltration in paraspinal muscles reversible with exercise in people with low back pain? A systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Spinal mobility and paraspinal muscle degeneration: a cross-sectional analysis from the Berlin Back Study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Automated lumbar muscles segmentation with segment anything model for adult degenerative scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Degeneration of paraspinal and gluteus medius muscles in nonspecific chronic low back pain: a quantitative MRI study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pathogenic mechanisms of adult degenerative scoliosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The "greta oto" sign for diagnosing axial myopathy with low back pain as the major clinical manifestation: a novel MRI sign with report of four cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Risk factors for pedicle screw loosening: a comprehensive review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul W HodgesSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. p.hodges@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-9107
Jeannie F BaileyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-7512
Maryse FortinDepartment of Health, Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1189-3591
Michele C BattiéFaculty of Health Sciences and Western's Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-2040
Concordia University · CAThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParaspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.

methodsThree key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.

resultsPossible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.

conclusionStudy designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingParaspinal MusclesLumbar VertebraePhenotypeSpineImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultifidusParaspinal musclesUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34542672
OpenAlexW3201038160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.