Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542653›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2021

[Functional reconstruction in traumatic paralysis].

Birgit Weyand, Marcus Spies

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birgit WeyandKlinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, OE 6260, Carl-Neubergstr. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. weyand.birgit@mh-hannover.de.
Marcus SpiesKlinik für Plastische, Hand und wiederherstellende Chirurgie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic nerve injuries are associated with a high morbidity and long rehabilitation times. The extent of a nerve lesion and the related regeneration potential can often only be estimated during the course, whereby the time window for successful surgical interventions is limited.

objectiveThe incidence and distribution of traumatic nerve lesions are reported. Algorithms for treatment decisions are presented. MATERIAL AND

methodsStatistics from the German TraumaRegister DGU® as well as international registers were evaluated. The results of basic research and expert recommendations for diagnostics and treatment are discussed. RESULTS AND

conclusionA strategic approach to conservative and surgical treatment of traumatic nerve injuries depending on the extent of injury and resulting regeneration potential is recommended. In conjunction with the clinical course, electrophysiology and imaging diagnostics, e.g. nerve sonography, can help to differentiate between neurapraxia, axonotmesis and neurotmesis.

Indexed as

Peripheral Nerve InjuriesHumansIncidenceParalysisUltrasonographyNerve regenerationNerve transferNeurosurgical proceduresReconstructive surgical proceduresTrauma, nervous system

Identifiers

PMID34542653
OpenAlexW3201239640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.