ArticleClinical neuroradiology2022
Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Automatic Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Delineation Tool for Clinical Use.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for refining interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging scans in the management of multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- MR Imaging Features of Critical Spinal Demyelinating Lesions Associated with Progressive Motor Impairment.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Observational
- Deep Learning-based Identification of Brain MRI Sequences Using a Model Trained on Large Multicentric Study Cohorts.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Review
- Scanner agnostic large-scale evaluation of MS lesion delineation tool for clinical MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo implement and validate an existing algorithm for automatic delineation of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) on a local single-center dataset.
methodsWe implemented a white matter hyperintensity segmentation model, based on a 2D convolutional neural network, using the conventional T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequence as input. The model was adapted for delineation of MS lesions by further training on a local dataset of 93 MS patients with a total of 3040 lesions. A quantitative evaluation was performed on ten test patients, in which model-generated masks were compared to manually delineated masks from two expert delineators. A subsequent qualitative evaluation of the implemented model was performed by two expert delineators, in which generated delineation masks on a clinical dataset of 53 patients were rated acceptable (< 10% errors) or unacceptable (> 10% errors) based on the total number of true lesions.
resultsThe quantitative evaluation resulted in an average accuracy score (F1) of 0.71, recall of 0.77 and dice similarity coefficient of 0.62. Our implemented model obtained the highest scores in all three metrics, when compared to three out of the box lesion segmentation models. In the clinical evaluation an average of 94% of our 53 model-generated masks were rated acceptable.
conclusionAfter adaptation to our local dataset, the implemented segmentation model was able to delineate MS lesions with a high clinical value as rated by delineation experts while outperforming popular out of the box applications. This serves as a promising step towards implementation of automatic lesion delineation in our MS clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.