Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542640›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Avian Neo-Sex Chromosomes Reveal Dynamics of Recombination Suppression and W Degeneration.

Hanna Sigeman, Maria Strandh, Estelle Proux-Wéra, Verena E Kutschera, Suvi Ponnikas, Hongkai Zhang, Max Lundberg, Lucile Soler, Ignas Bunikis, Maja Tarka and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic origins and evolution of neo-sex chromosomes in Pacific Island birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hanna SigemanDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1457-4174
Maria StrandhDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Estelle Proux-WéraDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Verena E KutscheraDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Suvi PonnikasDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hongkai ZhangDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Max LundbergDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lucile SolerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ignas BunikisDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala Genome Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maja TarkaDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Dennis HasselquistDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Björn NystedtDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena WesterdahlDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Bengt HanssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-8169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the avian sex chromosomes first evolved from autosomes remains elusive as 100 million years (My) of divergence and degeneration obscure their evolutionary history. The Sylvioidea group of songbirds is interesting for understanding avian sex chromosome evolution because a chromosome fusion event ∼24 Ma formed "neo-sex chromosomes" consisting of an added (new) and an ancestral (old) part. Here, we report the complete female genome (ZW) of one Sylvioidea species, the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). Our long-read assembly shows that the added region has been translocated to both Z and W, and whereas the added-Z has retained its gene order the added-W part has been heavily rearranged. Phylogenetic analyses show that recombination between the homologous added-Z and -W regions continued after the fusion event, and that recombination suppression across this region took several million years to be completed. Moreover, recombination suppression was initiated across multiple positions over the added-Z, which is not consistent with a simple linear progression starting from the fusion point. As expected following recombination suppression, the added-W show signs of degeneration including repeat accumulation and gene loss. Finally, we present evidence for nonrandom maintenance of slowly evolving and dosage-sensitive genes on both ancestral- and added-W, a process causing correlated evolution among orthologous genes across broad taxonomic groups, regardless of sex linkage.

Indexed as

PasseriformesSongbirdsAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemalePhylogenyRecombination, GeneticSex Chromosomesbirddegenerationneo-sex chromosomerecombinationsex chromosomevertebrate

Identifiers

PMID34542640
PMCPMC8662655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.