ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment of Silicone Particle Migration Among Women Undergoing Removal or Revision of Silicone Breast Implants in the Netherlands.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implant replacement and anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with breast implants: a quantitative analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Delayed progressive fibrotic lung disease associated with bilateral silicone breast implant rupture: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Capsulectomy Following Breast Implant Removal: Evidence-Based Indications and a Framework for Clinical Decision-Making.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Silicone Breast Implants as a Model System for Understanding Polymer Permeation in Soft Materials In Vivo.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Migratory periocular silicone granulomas following breast implantation mimicking sarcoidosis.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Silicone Axillary Lymphadenopathy Associated With Rupture of Fourth-Generation Cohesive Silicone Breast Implants Following Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
- Beyond the Surface: Deciphering the Role of Genetic Susceptibility in BIA-ALCL Pathogenesis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Diminished fibrotic encapsulation and comparable physicochemical properties of poly (styrene-Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Breast implant illness after reconstruction with silicone breast implants.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Most Important Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications of Silicones.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Breast Implant Illness.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Extracapsular breast implant rupture with silicone migration and lymphadenopathy following a breast augmentation - A case report.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2025Article
- Testing Mechanical Properties of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants and Their Degradation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- A Prospective Observational Clinical Cohort of Women with Suspected Breast Implant Illness.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Why Is the Baker Classification Inadequate for Classifying Silicone Implant Fibrous Capsules?Cureus · 2024Article
- Silicone Migration from Intact Saline Breast Implants.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Microbes, Histology, Blood Analysis, Enterotoxins, and Cytokines: Findings From the ASERF Systemic Symptoms in Women-Biospecimen Analysis Study: Part 3.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2023Article
- Exposure to silicone breast implant-infused media is detrimental tomicroPublication biology · 2023Article
- Breast silicone implants' pericapsular impairment: current underdiagnosed status.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Prevalence of Local Postoperative Complications and Breast Implant Illness in Women With Breast Implants.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Silicone breast implants have been on the market for breast augmentation or breast reconstruction for approximately 60 years but may lead to medical complications, also called breast implant illness. Objective: To evaluate the existence of silicone gel bleed and migration over a long time period, including the period in which the newer cohesive silicone gel breast implants were used. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-center case series, capsule tissue and lymph node samples were collected from women who underwent removal or revision of silicone breast implants from January 1, 1986, to August 18, 2020, and data were extracted from the pathological reports and revision of the histology if data were missing. All tissues were examined using standard light microscopy, some extended with modified oil red O staining and energy-dispersive radiographic spectroscopy. A total of 365 women had capsular tissue removed, including 15 patients who also had lymph nodes removed, and 24 women had only lymph nodes removed. Data were analyzed from January to May 2021. Exposures: Silicone breast implants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was presence or absence of silicones inside or outside the capsule. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine significance between groups. Results: Among a total of 389 women with silicone breast implants (mean [SD] age, 50.5 [11.2] years), 384 women (98.8%) had silicone particles present in the tissues, indicating silicone gel bleed. In 337 women (86.6%), silicone particles were observed outside the capsule (ie, in tissues surrounding the capsule and/or lymph nodes), indicating silicone migration. In 47 women (12.1%), silicone particles were only present within the capsule. In 5 women (1.2%), no silicone particles were detected in the tissues. Patients were divided into 2 groups, with 46 women who received cohesive silicone gel breast implants and 343 women who received either an older or a newer type of breast implant. There were no differences in silicone gel bleed or migration between groups (silicone detected outside or inside capsule: 44 women [95.7%] vs 340 women [99.1%]; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series including women with noncohesive or cohesive silicone gel breast implants, silicone leakage occurred in 98.8% of women, indicating silicone gel bleed, and in 86.6% of women, migration of silicone particles outside the capsule was detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.