ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2020
Scientific Mapping of Gamification in Web of Science.
Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gamification and Cognitive Factors: Research Hotspots, Knowledge Structure, and Future Directions Based on Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Global Research Trends in Oxidative Stress and Myocardial Fibrosis: A Dual-Software Bibliometric Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- "Pharmacotrophy": a playful tournament for game- and team-based learning in pharmacology education - assessing its impact on students' performance.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Comparison of Gamification, Game-Based Learning, and Serious Games in Medical Education: A Scientometrics Analysis.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2023Article
- Global research trends and hotspots analysis of hallux valgus: A bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2021.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Evolution of the Autism Literature and the Influence of Parents: A Scientific Mapping in Web of Science.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Trends in Autism Research in the Field of Education in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Study.Brain sciences · 2020Review
- Documentary Analysis of the Scientific Literature on Autism and Technology in Web of Science.Brain sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Education is a constantly changing field. The new teaching processes are developed today and all teachers should be prepared. Gamification is one of the methodologies with the greatest impact on the learning process. The objective of the study is to analyze the relevance and progression that the concepts "gamification" and "learning" have acquired in the scientific literature of Web of Science. This research has been based on a bibliometric methodology. A classic bibliometric and thematic analyses have been carried out. A 1230 document matrix analysis has been selected. For descriptive bibliometrics, the Bibliometrix library is used, while Scimat is used for the thematic analysis. Both tools are widely used in this type of study. Results indicate that growth on the study of these topics is booming. There are also authors who accumulate most of the documents, such as Martí Parreño. English is positioned as the predominant language. The topics studied have evolved from how classic games affect learning to the study of video games and their impact on performance. It is concluded that these types of studies are still relevant and with a great future prospect. Furthermore, research focuses especially on video games, on the effects of technology on learning and on the study of flipped learning experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.