Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542500›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2020

The Role of Field Training in STEM Education: Theoretical and Practical Limitations of Scalability.

Kseniia Nepeina, Natalia Istomina, Olga Bykova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of STEAM Activities Based on Experiential Learning on Ninth Graders' Mental Motivation.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  2. Impact of the Pandemic on STEAM Disciplines in the Sixth Grade of Primary Education.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kseniia NepeinaResearch Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek (RS RAS), Bishkek-49, RS RAS, Bishkek 720049, Kyrgyzstan.ORCID 0000-0003-0725-8023
Natalia IstominaMoscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK), Gorokhovsky pereulok, 4, 105064 Moscow, Russia.
Olga BykovaMoscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK), Gorokhovsky pereulok, 4, 105064 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian State Governmental Task AAAA-A19-119020190063-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we consider the features of the perception of student information in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, in order to draw the attention of researchers to the topic of learning in practice through field training. The article shows the results of these studies in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, as an example) to reflect the global trends. For this purpose, we examined the expectations of students in Russia and the CIS countries from training related to lectures and field training. We created a questionnaire and distributed it in three Moscow-based universities (Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography-MIIGAiK, Moscow Aviation Institute-MAI, and Moscow City University-MCU). Our key assumption is that field practices in Russian universities are qualitatively different from the phenomenon described in European literature, where digital or remote field practices have already emerged. The results obtained through the survey show the tendency of students' perceptions to fulfill practical duties (in a laboratory with instruments of field training) in STEM education.

Indexed as

Earth sciencesfield traininggeopolygonhigher educationnew educational modelqualificationskillsSTEM educationtest site

Identifiers

PMID34542500
PMCPMC8314252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.