Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542492›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2020

Measuring Heart Rate Variability Using Commercially Available Devices in Healthy Children: A Validity and Reliability Study.

Kathryn E Speer, Stuart Semple, Nenad Naumovski, Andrew J McKune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Association of Novel Oral Appliance Use With Heart Rate Variability in Adolescent Athletes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathryn E SpeerFaculty of Health, Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science/University of Canberra, Canberra (ACT) 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7370-9932
Stuart SempleFaculty of Health, Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science/University of Canberra, Canberra (ACT) 2617, Australia.
Nenad NaumovskiFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra (ACT) 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-4497
Andrew J McKuneFaculty of Health, Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science/University of Canberra, Canberra (ACT) 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-1544

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is an accepted method for determining autonomic nervous system activity and cardiovascular risk in various populations. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a commercially available finger photoplethysmography (PPG) system for measuring pediatric HRV in a real-world setting. Sixteen healthy children (4.06 ± 0.58 years) were recruited. The PPG system was compared to the Polar H10 heart rate (HR) sensor validated against ECG (gold standard) for HRV measurement. Seated short-term resting R-R intervals were recorded simultaneously using both systems. Recordings were performed on 3 days at the participants' school. Paired t-tests, effect sizes and Bland-Altman analyses determined the validity of the PPG system. The relative and absolute reliability of both systems were calculated. No HRV parameters were valid for the PPG system. Polar H10 yielded moderate (0.50-0.75) to good (0.75-0.90) relative reliability with R-R intervals and the standard deviation of instantaneous and continuous R-R variability ratio showing the best results (ICCs = 0.84). Polar H10 displayed better absolute reliability with the root mean square of successive differences, R-R intervals and HR showing the lowest values (TEM% < 12%). The use of the Polar H10 and not the PPG system is encouraged for HRV measurement of young children in an educational real-world setting.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous system or ANSchildrenheart rate variability or HRVphotoplethysmography or PPGPolar H10reliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID34542492
PMCPMC8314243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.