Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542455›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2021

Adaptation and Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire for Spanish Adolescents.

Adrián Segura-Robles, Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero, María-Elena Parra-González, Jesús López-Belmonte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrián Segura-RoblesDepartment of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-7129
Antonio-José Moreno-GuerreroDepartment of Didactics and School Organization, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3191-2048
María-Elena Parra-GonzálezDepartment of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6918-9126
Jesús López-BelmonteDepartment of Didactics and School Organization, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0823-3370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work adapts and validates the scale of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ), which is used to measure motivation. For this, an instrumental design was carried out with the purpose of analyzing the psychometric properties of the instrument. The sample consisted of 307 participants enrolled in compulsory secondary education. Reliability with fit indices were good in model B (proposed) with composite reliability, global reliability index, and Cronbach's alpha. The original model (A) presented small problems that had to be adjusted when carrying out the translation. We concluded that adaptation and subsequent validation of the MSLQ instrument into a Spanish context was positive. In this sense, adequate adjustment rates have been achieved. However, in its contextual adequacy, the need arises to modify the presentation of the items alluding to intrinsic motivation due to the difficulty of measuring such a construct. Among the implications reached in this study is the possibility of having a validated instrument for the Spanish adolescent context to measure motivation on educational aspects. Furthermore, this tool can serve as the basis for the design of other instruments that measure this construct in other age ranges.

Indexed as

extrinsic motivationintrinsic motivationmotivation in learningquestionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID34542455
PMCPMC8314341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.