Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542192›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2022

Comparison of pulse-dose and high-dose corticosteroids with no corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia in the intensive care unit.

Hamid Yaqoob, Daniel Greenberg, Frank Hwang, Curtis Lee, David Vernik, Ravi Manglani, Zhen Wang, M Hassan Murad, Dipak Chandy, Oleg Epelbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Corticosteroids in ARDS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hamid YaqoobDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1352-8811
Daniel GreenbergDepartment of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Frank HwangNew York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Curtis LeeNew York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
David VernikNew York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Ravi ManglaniDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Zhen WangEvidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA.
M Hassan MuradEvidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA.
Dipak ChandyDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Oleg EpelbaumDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticosteroid dosing in the range of 0.5-2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone equivalents has become a standard part of the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia based on positive results of randomized trials and a meta-analysis. Alongside such conventional dosing, administration of 1 gm of methylprednisolone daily (pulse dosing) has also been reported in the literature with claims of favorable outcomes. Comparisons between such disparate approaches to corticosteroids for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia are lacking. In this retrospective study of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia, we compared patients treated with 0.5-2 mg/kg/day in methylprednisolone equivalents (high-dose corticosteroids) and patients treated with 1 gm of methylprednisolone (pulse-dose corticosteroids) to those who did not receive any corticosteroids. The endpoints of interest were hospital mortality, ICU-free days at Day 28, and complications potentially attributable to corticosteroids. Pulse-dose corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant increase in ICU-free days at Day 28 compared to no receipt: adjusted relative risk (aRR): 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.02; p = 0.03) and compared with high-dose corticosteroid administration (p = 0.003). Nonetheless, receipt of high-dose corticosteroids-but not of pulse-dose corticosteroids-significantly reduced the odds of hospital mortality compared to no receipt: adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12-0.77; p = 0.01). High-dose corticosteroids reduced mortality compared to pulse-dose corticosteroids (p = 0.04). Pulse-dose corticosteroids-but not high-dose corticosteroids-significantly increased the odds of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy compared to no receipt: aOR 3.53 (95% CI: 1.27-9.82; p = 0.02). The odds of this complication were also significantly higher in the pulse-dose group when compared to the high-dose group (p = 0.05 for the comparison). In this single-center study, pulse-dose corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia in the ICU was associated with an increase in ICU-free days but failed to impact hospital mortality, perhaps because of its association with development of severe renal failure. In line with existing trial data, the effect of high-dose corticosteroids on mortality was favorable.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAcute Kidney InjuryAdrenal Cortex HormonesCOVID-19Critical CareHospital MortalityHumansMethylprednisolonePulse Therapy, DrugRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Adrenal Cortex HormonesMethylprednisolonecorticosteroidsCOVID-19glucocorticoidsintensive care unitmethylprednisolonepneumoniapulseSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34542192
PMCPMC8662051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.