Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34542076›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

Combining Multimodal Behavioral Data of Gait, Speech, and Drawing for Classification of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Yasunori Yamada, Kaoru Shinkawa, Masatomo Kobayashi, Vittorio Caggiano, Miyuki Nemoto, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasunori YamadaDigital Health, IBM Research, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaoru ShinkawaDigital Health, IBM Research, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatomo KobayashiDigital Health, IBM Research, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan.
Vittorio CaggianoHealthcare and Life Sciences, IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Miyuki NemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kiyotaka NemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tetsuaki AraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait, speech, and drawing behaviors have been shown to be sensitive to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, previous studies focused on only analyzing individual behavioral modalities, although these studies suggested that each of these modalities may capture different profiles of cognitive impairments associated with AD.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate if combining behavioral data of gait, speech, and drawing can improve classification performance compared with the use of individual modality and if each of these behavioral data can be associated with different cognitive and clinical measures for the diagnosis of AD and MCI.

methodsBehavioral data of gait, speech, and drawing were acquired from 118 AD, MCI, and cognitively normal (CN) participants.

resultsCombining all three behavioral modalities achieved 93.0% accuracy for classifying AD, MCI, and CN, and only 81.9% when using the best individual behavioral modality. Each of these behavioral modalities was statistically significantly associated with different cognitive and clinical measures for diagnosing AD and MCI.

conclusionOur findings indicate that these behaviors provide different and complementary information about cognitive impairments such that classification of AD and MCI is superior to using either in isolation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedFemaleGaitHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSpeechDrawinggait analysishandwritingmachine learningspeechvoicewalking

Identifiers

PMID34542076
PMCPMC8609704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.