Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541920›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Retrospective Comparison of Andexanet Alfa and 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex for Reversal of Factor Xa-Inhibitor Related Bleeding.

Victoria M Stevens, Toby C Trujillo, Tyree H Kiser, Robert MacLaren, Paul M Reynolds, Scott W Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Coagulation and Transfusion Updates From 2021.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Differential Neutralization of Apixaban, Betrixaban, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban by Andexanet Alfa as Measured by Whole Blood Thromboelastographic Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
  15. Use of Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in US Verified Trauma Centers: A National Survey.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria M Stevens15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-0297
Toby C Trujillo15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.
Tyree H Kiser15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-3999
Robert MacLaren15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.
Paul M Reynolds15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.
Scott W Mueller15503University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22095Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex (4F-PCC) for reversal of factor Xa (FXa)-inhibitor bleeding. Patients that received andexanet alfa for reversal were included. An equivalent number of patients administered 4F-PCC for FXa-inhibitor bleeding were randomly selected as historical controls. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis achievement within 12 h, defined using ANNEXA-4 criteria. Thromboembolic events and mortality within 30 days were also evaluated. A total of 32 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between andexanet alfa (n = 16) and 4F-PCC (n = 16). Intracranial bleeding was the primary reversal indication in 43.8% versus 62.5% of patients, respectively. Effective hemostasis was reached in 75.0% of andexanet alfa patients compared to 62.5% of 4F-PCC patients (

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFactor XaFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleProthrombinRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesFactor XaProthrombinPRT064445Recombinant Proteinsandexanet alfaapixabancoagulation factor Xa (recombinant)direct-acting oral anticoagulantsfactor Xa inhibitorshemorrhageinactivated-zhzoreversalrivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID34541920
PMCPMC8642040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.