ReviewPhysiological reviews2022
The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.
Review in Physiological reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of non-invasive brain-computer interface technology on the therapeutic effect of patients with spinal cord injury: a summary of evidence based on meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Distinct Neural Modes Carry Information About Attempted Grasp Timing and Force in the Sensorimotor Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dichotomy between extracellular signatures of active dendritic chemical synapses and gap junctions.eLife · 2026Article
- Integration of learned artificial sensation with vision during freely moving navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Closed-loop error damping in human BCI using pre-error motor cortex activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Magnetic NeuroRing: a portable adaptive brain-computer interface for real-time transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke motor rehabilitation.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Visual context affects the perceived timing of tactile sensations elicited through intracortical microstimulation: a case study of two participants.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Disentangling indirect versus direct effects of somatosensory cortex microstimulation on neurons in primary motor and ventral premotor cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Making brain-computer interfaces as reliable as muscles.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Aerosol Jet Printing for Neuroprosthetic Device Development.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Moving beyond single-electrode intracortical-microstimulation-evoked tactile perception.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Stabilizing brain-computer interfaces through alignment of latent dynamics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A novel robot-assisted method for implanting intracortical sensorimotor devices for brain-computer interface studies: principles, surgical techniques, and challenges.Journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Motor somatotopy impacts imagery strategy success in human intracortical brain-computer interfaces.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- The Next Frontier in Neuroprosthetics: Integration of Biomimetic Somatosensory Feedback.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Generalist Intracortical Motor Decoder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Neural populations are dynamic but constrained.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Neurotechnologies Inspired by Motor Primitive Model for Restoring Human Natural Movement.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.