ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021
Physical density estimations of single- and dual-energy CT using material-based forward projection algorithm: a simulation study.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Truth-based physics informed estimation of material composition in spectral CT in terms of density and effective atomic number.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the accuracy of physical density prediction in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) by adapting a fully simulation-based method using a material-based forward projection algorithm (MBFPA).
methodsWe used biological tissues referenced in ICRU Report 44 and tissue substitutes to prepare three different types of phantoms for calibrating the Hounsfield unit (HU)-to-density curves. Sinograms were first virtually generated by the MBFPA with four representative energy spectra (
resultsThe relative mean square errors (RMSEs) of the physical density by the HU-to-density curves calibrated with kV SECT nearly presented no phantom size dependence. The kV-kV DECT calibrated curves were also comparable with those from the kV SECT. The phantom size effect became notable when the MV X-ray beams were employed for both SECT and DECT due to beam-hardening effects. The RMSEs were decreased using the biological tissue phantom.
conclusionSimulation-based density prediction can be useful in the theoretical analysis of SECT and DECT calibrations. The results of this study indicated that the accuracy of SECT calibration is comparable with that of DECT using biological tissues. The size and shape of the calibration phantom could affect the accuracy, especially for MV CT calibrations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present study is based on a full simulation environment, which accommodates various situations such as SECT, kV-kV DECT, and even kV-MV DECT. In this paper, we presented the advances pertaining to the accuracy of the physical density prediction when applied to SECT and DECT in the MV X-ray energy range. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to validate the physical density estimation both in SECT and DECT using human-type phantoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.