Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541583›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2021

KGDAL: Knowledge Graph Guided Double Attention LSTM for Rolling Mortality Prediction for AKI-D Patients.

Lucas Jing Liu, Victor Ortiz-Soriano, Javier A Neyra, Jin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. KIT-LSTM: Knowledge-guided Time-aware LSTM for Continuous Clinical Risk Prediction.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas Jing LiuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Victor Ortiz-SorianoDivision of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Javier A NeyraDivision of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Jin ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

UAB-UCSD O'Brien Core Center for Acute Kidney Injury ResearchP30DK079337 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AGARWAL, ANUPAM · 2008 to 2022
$18.3M
Artificial Intelligence to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury on Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyR01DK133539 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Girish Nitin Nadkarni, Javier A. Neyra · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Risk Clustering and Stratification in Genetically High-Risk Individuals Using Electronic Medical Records and BiomarkersK23DK107908 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI NADKARNI, GIRISH NITIN · 2016 to 2020
$930k
Artificial Intelligence to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury on Continuous Renal Replacement TherapyR56DK126930 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI NADKARNI, GIRISH NITIN, NEYRA, JAVIER A. · 2020 to 2020
$100k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK107908NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079337NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133539NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK126930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid accumulation of electronic health record (EHR) data, deep learning (DL) models have exhibited promising performance on patient risk prediction. Recent advances have also demonstrated the effectiveness of knowledge graphs (KG) in providing valuable prior knowledge for further improving DL model performance. However, it is still unclear how KG can be utilized to encode high-order relations among clinical concepts and how DL models can make full use of the encoded concept relations to solve real-world healthcare problems and to interpret the outcomes. We propose a novel knowledge graph guided double attention LSTM model named KGDAL for rolling mortality prediction for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D). KGDAL constructs a KG-based two-dimension attention in both time and feature spaces. In the experiment with two large healthcare datasets, we compared KGDAL with a variety of rolling mortality prediction models and conducted an ablation study to test the effectiveness, efficacy, and contribution of different attention mechanisms. The results showed that KGDAL clearly outperformed all the compared models. Also, KGDAL-derived patient risk trajectories may assist healthcare providers to make timely decisions and actions. The source code, sample data, and manual of KGDAL are available at https://github.com/lucasliu0928/KGDAL.

Indexed as

Attention MechanismDeep LearningKnowledge GraphRolling Mortality Prediction

Identifiers

PMID34541583
PMCPMC8445228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.