Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541530›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Inaccurate cortical tracking of speech in adults with impaired speech perception in noise.

Marc Vander Ghinst, Mathieu Bourguignon, Vincent Wens, Gilles Naeije, Cecile Ducène, Maxime Niesen, Sergio Hassid, Georges Choufani, Serge Goldman, Xavier De Tiège

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reduced neural speech tracking in adolescents with listening difficulty.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marc Vander GhinstLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-5901
Mathieu BourguignonLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Vincent WensLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Gilles NaeijeLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Cecile DucèneLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Maxime NiesenLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Sergio HassidService, d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Georges ChoufaniService, d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Serge GoldmanLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Xavier De TiègeLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau, UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired speech perception in noise despite normal peripheral auditory function is a common problem in young adults. Despite a growing body of research, the pathophysiology of this impairment remains unknown. This magnetoencephalography study characterizes the cortical tracking of speech in a multi-talker background in a group of highly selected adult subjects with impaired speech perception in noise without peripheral auditory dysfunction. Magnetoencephalographic signals were recorded from 13 subjects with impaired speech perception in noise (six females, mean age: 30 years) and matched healthy subjects while they were listening to 5 different recordings of stories merged with a multi-talker background at different signal to noise ratios (No Noise, +10, +5, 0 and -5 dB). The cortical tracking of speech was quantified with coherence between magnetoencephalographic signals and the temporal envelope of (i) the global auditory scene (i.e. the attended speech stream and the multi-talker background noise), (ii) the attended speech stream only and (iii) the multi-talker background noise. Functional connectivity was then estimated between brain areas showing altered cortical tracking of speech in noise in subjects with impaired speech perception in noise and the rest of the brain. All participants demonstrated a selective cortical representation of the attended speech stream in noisy conditions, but subjects with impaired speech perception in noise displayed reduced cortical tracking of speech at the syllable rate (i.e. 4-8 Hz) in all noisy conditions. Increased functional connectivity was observed in subjects with impaired speech perception in noise in Noiseless and speech in noise conditions between supratemporal auditory cortices and left-dominant brain areas involved in semantic and attention processes. The difficulty to understand speech in a multi-talker background in subjects with impaired speech perception in noise appears to be related to an inaccurate auditory cortex tracking of speech at the syllable rate. The increased functional connectivity between supratemporal auditory cortices and language/attention-related neocortical areas probably aims at supporting speech perception and subsequent recognition in adverse auditory scenes. Overall, this study argues for a central origin of impaired speech perception in noise in the absence of any peripheral auditory dysfunction.

Indexed as

coherence analysisfunctional connectivitymagnetoencephalographyspeech-in-noise

Identifiers

PMID34541530
PMCPMC8445395
OpenAlexW3200772732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.