Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541425›Full record

ArticlePersonalized medicine in psychiatry

A cross-diagnostic study of Adherence to Ecological Momentary Assessment: Comparisons across study length and daily survey frequency find that early adherence is a potent predictor of study-long adherence.

Sara E Jones, Raeanne C Moore, Amy E Pinkham, Colin A Depp, Eric Granholm, Philip D Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personalized medicine in psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient adherence and response time in electronic patient-reported outcomes: insights from three longitudinal clinical trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara E JonesUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Raeanne C MooreUCSD Health Sciences Center, La Jolla, CA.
Amy E PinkhamUniversity of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.
Colin A DeppUCSD Health Sciences Center, La Jolla, CA.
Eric GranholmUCSD Health Sciences Center, La Jolla, CA.
Philip D HarveyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.

Funding

Introspective Accuracy, Bias, and Everyday Functioning in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH112620 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PINKHAM, AMY · 2018 to 2021
$3.2M
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Functioning in SchizophreniaI01CX000810 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI GRANHOLM, ERIC L · 2013 to 2015
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000810NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a highly valid strategy to assess everyday functioning in people with severe mental illness. Adherence is generally good, but several questions regarding the impact of study length, daily density of sampling, and symptom severity on adherence remain.

methodsEMA adherence in two separate studies was examined. One sampled participants with schizophrenia (n=106) and healthy controls (n=76) 7 times per day for 7 days and the other sampled participants with schizophrenia (n=104) and participants with bipolar illness (n=76) 3 times per day for 30 days. Participants were asked where they were, who they were with, what they were doing and how they were feeling in both studies. The impact of rates of very early adherence on eventual adherence was investigated across the samples, and adherence rates were examined for associations with mood state and most common location when answering surveys.

resultsMedian levels of adherence were over 80% across the samples, and the 10 IMPLICATIONS: Adherence was quite high and was not correlated with the length of the study or the density of sampling per study day. There was a tendency for bipolar participants who were more commonly away from home to answer fewer surveys but overall adherence for the bipolar patients was quite high. These data suggest that early nonadherence is a potential predictor of eventual nonadherence and study noncompletion.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderecological momentary assessmentEMA completion ratesschizophreniasurvey adherence

Identifiers

PMID34541425
PMCPMC8442600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.