Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541366›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational research2021

Scope and challenges of machine learning-based diagnosis and prognosis in clinical dentistry: A literature review.

Lilian Toledo Reyes, Jessica Klöckner Knorst, Fernanda Ruffo Ortiz, Thiago Machado Ardenghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Descriptive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lilian Toledo ReyesDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Jessica Klöckner KnorstDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Fernanda Ruffo OrtizDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Thiago Machado ArdenghiDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) has emerged as a branch of artificial intelligence dealing with the analysis of large amounts of data. The applications of ML algorithms have also expanded to health care, including dentistry. Recent advances in this field point to future improvements in diagnostic techniques and the prognosis of various diseases of the teeth and other maxillofacial structures.

aimThe aim of this literature review is to describe the basis for ML being applied to different dental sub-fields in recent years, to identify typical algorithms used in the studies, and to summarize the scope and challenges of using these techniques in dental clinical practice. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: The proficiency of emerging technologies that have begun to show encouraging results in the diagnosis and prognosis of oral diseases can improve the precision in the selection of treatment for patients. It is necessary to understand the challenges associated with using these tools to effectively use them in dental services and ensure a higher quality of care for patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedentistrydiagnosismachine learningoral healthprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34541366
PMCPMC8445629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.