ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
SSMFN: a fused spatial and sequential deep learning model for methylation site prediction.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- PhosF3C: a feature fusion architecture with fine-tuned protein language model and conformer for prediction of general phosphorylation site.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Mini-review: Recent advances in post-translational modification site prediction based on deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional
methodWe designed our model to be able to extract spatial and sequential information from amino acid sequences. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) is applied to harness spatial information, while long short-term memory (LSTM) is applied for sequential data. The latent representation of the CNN and LSTM branch are then fused. Afterwards, we compared the performance of our proposed model to the state-of-the-art methylation site prediction models on the balanced and imbalanced dataset.
resultsOur model appeared to be better in almost all measurement when trained on the balanced training dataset. On the imbalanced training dataset, all of the models gave better performance since they are trained on more data. In several metrics, our model also surpasses the PRMePred model, which requires a laborious effort for feature extraction and selection.
conclusionOur models achieved the best performance across different environments in almost all measurements. Also, our result suggests that the NN model trained on a balanced training dataset and tested on an imbalanced dataset will offer high specificity and low sensitivity. Thus, the NN model for methylation site prediction should be trained on an imbalanced dataset. Since in the actual application, there are far more negative samples than positive samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.