Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34541288›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

The Cognitive Online Self-Test Amsterdam (COST-A): Establishing norm scores in a community-dwelling population.

Leonie N C Visser, Mark A Dubbelman, Merike Verrijp, Lisa Wanders, Sophie Pelt, Marissa D Zwan, Dick H J Thijssen, Hans Wouters, Sietske A M Sikkes, Hein P J van Hout and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cohort Profile: The Nijmegen Exercise Study (NES).International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leonie N C VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Mark A DubbelmanAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Merike VerrijpAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Lisa WandersRadboud Institute for Health Sciences Department of Physiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Sophie PeltAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Marissa D ZwanAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Dick H J ThijssenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences Department of Physiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Hans WoutersGeneral Practitioners Research Institute Groningen The Netherlands.
Sietske A M SikkesAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Hein P J van HoutDepartment of General Practice and Medicine for Older Persons Amsterdam Institute for Public Health Care Research Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC VU University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeightened public awareness about Alzheimer's disease and dementia increases the need for at-home cognitive self-testing. We offered Cognitive Online Self-Test Amsterdam (COST-A) to independent groups of cognitively normal adults and investigated the robustness of a norm-score formula and cutoff.

methodsThree thousand eighty-eight participants (mean age ± standard deviation = 61 ± 12 years, 70% female) completed COST-A and evaluated it. Demographically adjusted norm scores were the difference between expected COST-A scores, based on age, gender, and education, and actual scores. We applied the resulting norm-score formula to two independent cohorts.

resultsParticipants evaluated COST-A to be of adequate difficulty and duration. Our norm-score formula was shown to be robust: ≈8% of participants in two cognitively normal cohorts had abnormal scores. A cutoff of -1.5 standard deviations proved optimal for distinguishing normal from impaired cognition.

conclusionWith robust norm scores, COST-A is a promising new tool for research and clinical practice, providing low cost and minimally invasive remote assessment of cognitive functioning.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasecognitionnormative dataremote assessmentscreenerself‐testing

Identifiers

PMID34541288
PMCPMC8438682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.