Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540712›Full record

ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2021

Ultrasound-Based Indications for Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration: Outcome of a TIRADS-Based Approach versus Operators' Expertise.

Tamas Solymosi, Laszlo Hegedüs, Steen Joop Bonnema, Andrea Frasoldati, Laszlo Jambor, Gabor Laszlo Kovacs, Enrico Papini, Karoly Rucz, Gilles Russ, Zsolt Karanyi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European thyroid journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tamas SolymosiEndocrinology and Metabolism Clinic, Bugat Hospital, Gyöngyös, Hungary.
Laszlo HegedüsDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Steen Joop BonnemaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Andrea FrasoldatiEndocrinology Unit of Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Laszlo JamborDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gabor Laszlo Kovacs1st Department of Medicine, Flohr Ferenc Hospital, Kerepestarcsa, Hungary.
Enrico PapiniRegina Apostolorum Hospital in Albano, Rome, Italy.
Karoly Rucz1st Department of Medicine, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Gilles RussUnité Thyroïde et Tumeurs Endocrines - Pr Leenhardt Hôpital La Pitie Salpetriere, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Zsolt KaranyiDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Endre V NagyDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThyroid nodule image reporting and data systems (TIRADS) provide the indications for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) based on a combination of nodule sonographic features and size. We compared the TIRADS-based recommendations for FNA with those based on the personal expertise of qualified US investigators in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy.

methodsSeven highly experienced ultrasound (US) investigators from 4 countries evaluated, online, the US video recordings of 123 histologically verified thyroid nodules. Technical resources provided the operators with a diagnostic approach close to the real-world practice. Altogether, 4,305 TIRADS scores were computed. The combined diagnostic potential of TIRADS (TIRSYS) and the personal recommendations of the investigators (PERS) were compared against 3 possible goals: to recognize all malignant lesions (allCA), nonpapillary plus non-pT1 papillary cancers (nPnT1PCA), or stage II-IV cancers (st2-4CA).

resultsFor allCA and nPnT1PCA, TIRSYS had lower sensitivity than PERS (69.8 vs. 87.2 and 83.5 vs. 92.6%, respectively,

conclusionsRecommendations for FNA based on the investigators' US expertise demonstrated a better sensitivity for thyroid cancer in the 2 best prognostic groups, while TIRADS methodology showed superior specificity over the full prognostic range of cancers. Thus, personal experience provided more accurate diagnoses of malignancy, missing a lower number of small thyroid cancers, but the TIRADS approach resulted in a similar accuracy for the diagnosis of potentially aggressive lesions while sparing a relevant number of FNAs. Until it is not clearly stated what the goal of the US evaluation is, that is to diagnose all or only clinically relevant thyroid cancers, it cannot be determined whether one diagnostic approach is superior to the other for recommending FNA.

Indexed as

CytologyThyroid carcinomaThyroid noduleThyroid nodule image reporting and data systemsUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34540712
PMCPMC8406242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.