ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021
Long-term outcomes of focal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pachychoroid diseases of the macula: an update.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Review
- Macular neovascularization and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: phenotypic variations, pathogenic mechanisms and implications in management.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Visual Recovery and Prognosis in the Treatment of Submacular Hemorrhage due to Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy and Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysm: A Retrospective Study.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Article
- Current Trends in Clinical Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Perspective from Vietnam.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the long-term effect and safety of focal laser photocoagulation treatment in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).
methodsMedical records of 13 eyes of 13 patients with PCV were followed-up for more than 2y after focal laser photocoagulation treatment. The patients were diagnosed with PCV using indocyanine green angiography, and eyes with other comorbid ocular diseases were excluded. The measurement outcomes of the study were the post-treatment regression and recurrence of polyps, complications, and changes in visual acuities. Paired
resultsThe mean age of the 13 patients was 70.2±5.5y, and the follow-up period was 72.3±31.0 (range, 25-118)mo. Three eyes had juxtafoveal polyps and 10 eyes had extrafoveal polyps. Of the 13 eyes, 9 eyes (69.2%) had regression of polyps 1.7±1.2 (range, 0.9-4)mo after focal laser photocoagulation. Five eyes (55.6%) showed recurrence of polyps during the follow-up periods, and the recurrence period was 12.8±18.9 (range, 1.9-48)mo. Mild subretinal hemorrhage occurred in two eyes (15.4%) 27 and 72d after laser treatment, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in visual acuities at baseline; 1, 2, 3y post-treatment (all
conclusionFocal laser photocoagulation is beneficial for early regression of polyps in eyes with PCV and does not result in significant submacular hemorrhage during the long-term follow-up. Furthermore, it can be primarily considered in eyes with PCV with extrafoveal or juxtafoveal polyps to regress risky polyps as well as to maintain visual acuity without serious hemorrhagic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.