Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540572›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2021

Adapted full-face snorkel masks as an alternative for COVID-19 personal protection during aerosol generating procedures in South Africa: A multi-centre, non-blinded

Ronel Herselman, Vidya Lalloo, Veronica Ueckermann, Daniel J van Tonder, Edwin de Jager, Sandra Spijkerman, Wanda van der Merwe, Marizane du Pisane, Fanie Hattingh, David Stanton and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ronel HerselmanHead of Department, Undergraduate and Surgical Skills Laboratories, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Vidya LallooDivision of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Veronica UeckermannDepartment Internal Medicine, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, South Africa.
Daniel J van TonderFaculty Operations, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Edwin de JagerFaculty Operations, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Sandra SpijkermanHead of Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Wanda van der MerweUndergraduate Skills Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Marizane du PisaneDivision of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Fanie HattinghHealth Solutions Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
David StantonNetcare Education, Faculty of Emergency and Critical Care, South Africa.
Ross HofmeyrDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Pretoria · ZASteve Biko Hospital · ZARight to Care · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSARS-CoV-2 has resulted in increased worldwide demand for personal protective equipment (PPE). With pressure from ongoing epidemic and endemic episodes, we assessed an adapted snorkel mask that provides full-face protection for healthcare workers (HCWs), particularly during aerosol-generating procedures. These masks have a custom-made adaptor which allows the fitment of standard medical respiratory filters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit, seal and clinical usability of these masks.

methodsThis multicentre, non-blinded

resultsWhilst fit and usability data were generally satisfactory, two of the 52 participants (3.8%) felt that the mask did not span the correct distance from the nose to the chin, and 3 of 34 participants (8.8%) who underwent qualitative testing with a Bitrex test failed. The majority of users reported no fogging, humidity or irritation. It was reportedly easy to speak while wearing the mask, although some participants perceived that they were not always understood. Twenty-one participants (40%) experienced a subjective physiological effect from wearing the mask; most commonly a sensation of shortness of breath. DISCUSSION: A fit-tested modified full-face snorkel mask may offer benefit as a substitute for N95 respirators and face shields. It is, however, important to properly select the correct mask based on size, fit testing, quality of the three-dimensional (3D) printed parts and respiratory filter to be used. Additionally, HCWs should be trained in the use of the mask, and each mask should be used by a single HCW and not shared.

Indexed as

COVID-19Full-face snorkel maskN95 alternativesPersonal protective equipment (PPE)SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34540572
PMCPMC8435371
OpenAlexW3200826010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.